Thomas Verheyen

28 papers receiving 796 citations

Peers

Thomas Verheyen
Comparison fields: 5 of 86
  • Fuel Technology 37
  • Geochemistry and Petrology 203
  • Analytical Chemistry 106
  • Mechanics of Materials 237
  • Process Chemistry and Technology 25
Replace Franciszek Czechowski with:
Franciszek Czechowski Poland
Philip J. Collin Australia
Alec F. Gaines United Kingdom
D. E. Anders United States
Vladislav V. Lobodin United States
G. Hussler France
C. White United Kingdom
Jia Wu China
Jeremiah M. Purcell United States
И. В. Кубракова Russia
Thomas Verheyen relative to Franciszek Czechowski Poland Franciszek Czechowski's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×12.5×
Franciszek Czechowski · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Thomas Verheyen

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas Verheyen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas Verheyen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas Verheyen more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas Verheyen

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas Verheyen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas Verheyen. The network helps show where Thomas Verheyen may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Thomas Verheyen, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Thomas Verheyen Line = papers co-authored together Thomas Verheyen links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 28 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1988108
2 198971
3 201158
4 201953
5 198952
6 198251
7 201547
8 198147
9 199040
10 198133
11 198433
12 198733
13 201332
14 199325
15 201921
16 198516
17 198415
18 198313
19 198211
20 198310

About Thomas Verheyen

Thomas Verheyen is a scholar working on Geochemistry and Petrology, Mechanics of Materials, Spectroscopy, Nuclear and High Energy Physics and Ocean Engineering, having authored 28 papers that have together received 831 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Coal and Its By-products (10 papers), Hydrocarbon exploration and reservoir analysis (8 papers), NMR spectroscopy and applications (7 papers), Coal Properties and Utilization (5 papers), Thermochemical Biomass Conversion Processes (5 papers), Advanced NMR Techniques and Applications (5 papers), Analytical chemistry methods development (3 papers) and Dendrimers and Hyperbranched Polymers (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Fuel Technology (37 citations), Geochemistry and Petrology (203 citations), Analytical Chemistry (106 citations), Mechanics of Materials (237 citations) and Process Chemistry and Technology (25 citations). Thomas Verheyen has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, Belgium and United States. Frequent co-authors include R.B. Johns, Patrick G. Hatcher, Harry E. Lerch, Wim M. De Borggraeve, Alan L. Chaffee, Saqib Nasir, Anne L. Bates, Samuel B. Adeloju, J. Espitalié and Jaya Kishore Vandavasi. Their work appears in journals such as Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, Fuel, Organic Geochemistry, International Journal of Coal Geology and Separation Science and Technology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact