Thomas Talbott

448 citations
20 papers · 109 · h-index 6

Impact in

  • Philosophy top 5%
    • Theology and Philosophy of Evil
    • War, Ethics, and Justification
    • Medieval Philosophy and Theology
    • Augustinian Studies and Theology
    • Philosophical Ethics and Theory
    • Karl Barth and Christian Theology

Papers in

    • Theology and Philosophy of Evil 10
    • War, Ethics, and Justification 5
    • Philosophical Ethics and Theory 4
    • Augustinian Studies and Theology 2
    • Classical Philosophy and Thought 1
    • Medieval Philosophy and Theology 1
    • American Constitutional Law and Politics 1

Thomas Talbott

19 papers receiving 86 citations

Peers

Thomas Talbott
Comparison fields: 5 of 14
  • Philosophy 88
  • Religious studies 13
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 14
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 9
  • Social Psychology 14
Replace Shirley Darcus Sullivan with:
Shirley Darcus Sullivan Canada
Risto Saarinen Finland
Christopher J. Insole United Kingdom
T. W. Rhys Davids South Africa
Iakovos Vasiliou United States
Jerome Gellman Israel
William J. Abraham United States
Klaas J. Kraay Canada
Pauliina Remes Sweden
Paul L. Gavrilyuk United States
Thomas Talbott relative to Shirley Darcus Sullivan Canada Shirley Darcus Sullivan's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.5×
Shirley Darcus Sullivan · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Thomas Talbott

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas Talbott's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas Talbott with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas Talbott more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas Talbott

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas Talbott. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas Talbott. The network helps show where Thomas Talbott may publish in the future.

No co-authors to show.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 199031
2 199011
3 198811
4 199310
5 20018
6 19866
7 19925
8 20135
9 20095
10 20044
11 19882
12 20082
13 20012
14 19822
15 19861
16 20021
17 19951
18
Indeterminism and chance occurrences
19791
19 20071
20 19930

About Thomas Talbott

Thomas Talbott is a scholar working on Philosophy, Political Science and International Relations, Social Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Religious studies, having authored 20 papers that have together received 109 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Theology and Philosophy of Evil (10 papers), War, Ethics, and Justification (5 papers), Philosophical Ethics and Theory (4 papers), Augustinian Studies and Theology (2 papers), Forgiveness and Related Behaviors (1 paper), American Constitutional Law and Politics (1 paper), Classical Philosophy and Thought (1 paper) and Medieval Philosophy and Theology (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Philosophy (88 citations), Religious studies (13 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (14 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (9 citations) and Social Psychology (14 citations). Thomas Talbott has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Their work appears in journals such as Faith and Philosophy, Religious Studies, International Journal for Philosophy of Religion, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research and Pacific philosophical quarterly.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact