Thomas Semple
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine top 5%
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine top 10%
- Surgery top 10%
- Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging top 10%
- Epidemiology
- Co-authors
- A. A. F. PeelW. M. LancasterJ. Le DallCátherine M. OwensJohn McGuinnessMichael T. AshworthAndrew BushSimon Padley
- Topics
- Congenital Diaphragmatic Hernia Studies (14 papers)Congenital Heart Disease Studies (12 papers)Neonatal Respiratory Health Research (12 papers)
- Journals
- The LancetSHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaAmerican Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited StatesNetherlands
In The Last Decade
Thomas Semple
69 papers receiving 964 citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 97
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 414
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 374
- Surgery 284
- Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 175
- Epidemiology 126
Countries citing papers authored by Thomas Semple
This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas Semple's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas Semple with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas Semple more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas Semple
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas Semple. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas Semple. The network helps show where Thomas Semple may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Thomas Semple
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Thomas Semple. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Thomas Semple based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Thomas Semple. Thomas Semple is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 2 | |
| 3 | 1 | |
| 4 | 2 | |
| 5 | 1 | |
| 6 | 4 | |
| 7 | 37 | |
| 8 | 0 | |
| 9 | 0 | |
| 10 | 3 | |
| 11 | 8 | |
| 12 | 2 | |
| 13 | 7 | |
| 14 | 3 | |
| 15 | 30 | |
| 16 | 1 | |
| 17 | 83 | |
| 18 | 2 | |
| 19 | A CORONARY PROGNOSTIC INDEX FOR GRADING THE SEVERITY OF INFARCTIONbreakdown → | 340 |
| 20 | 2 |
About Thomas Semple
Thomas Semple is a scholar working on Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine and Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, having authored 81 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Congenital Diaphragmatic Hernia Studies (14 papers), Congenital Heart Disease Studies (12 papers) and Neonatal Respiratory Health Research (12 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (414 citations), Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (374 citations) and Emergency Medicine (111 citations). Thomas Semple has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include A. A. F. Peel, W. M. Lancaster, J. Le Dall, Cátherine M. Owens, John McGuinness, Michael T. Ashworth, Andrew Bush, Simon Padley, Alistair Calder and Mark Rosenthal. Their work appears in journals such as The Lancet, SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología and American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.