Thomas Riemer

1.2k citations
46 papers · 787 · h-index 14

Impact in

Papers in

Thomas Riemer

37 papers receiving 765 citations

Peers

Thomas Riemer
Comparison fields: 5 of 99
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 265
  • Infectious Diseases 206
  • Neurology 135
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 127
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 91
Replace Christian Dualé with:
Christian Dualé France
Virginia D. Schmith United States
Lucia Galluzzo Italy
Carmelo Lafuente‐Lafuente France
Kendra Davis‐Plourde United States
Eric Wooltorton Canada
Alison Evans United Kingdom
Yuda Turana Indonesia
Christine Leong Canada
Amichai Perlman Israel
Thomas Riemer relative to Christian Dualé France Christian Dualé's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.3×
Christian Dualé · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Thomas Riemer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas Riemer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas Riemer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas Riemer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas Riemer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas Riemer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas Riemer. The network helps show where Thomas Riemer may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Thomas Riemer, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Thomas Riemer Line = papers co-authored together Thomas Riemer links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 46 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2020248
2 2013105
3 201352
4 202134
5 201230
6 201326
7 201425
8 202224
9 202120
10 201220
11 201319
12 202215
13 201614
14 201214
15 201413
16 202113
17 202313
18 202212
19 201212
20 201311

About Thomas Riemer

Thomas Riemer is a scholar working on Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Psychiatry and Mental health, Pharmacology, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience and Clinical Psychology, having authored 46 papers that have together received 787 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Treatment of Major Depression (11 papers), Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies (10 papers), Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior (8 papers), Psychedelics and Drug Studies (6 papers), Electroconvulsive Therapy Studies (5 papers), Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (4 papers), Chemical synthesis and alkaloids (4 papers) and Schizophrenia research and treatment (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (265 citations), Infectious Diseases (206 citations), Neurology (135 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (127 citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (91 citations). Thomas Riemer has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Switzerland and Italy. Frequent co-authors include Reinhold Kreutz, Engi Algharably, Michel Azizi, Tomasz J. Guzik, Aleksander Prejbisz, Ji‐Guang Wang, Alexandre Persu, Piotr Dobrowolski, Michel Burnier and Andrzej Januszewicz. Their work appears in journals such as Frontiers in Psychiatry, Pharmacopsychiatry, Scientific Reports, Cardiovascular Research and European Journal of Preventive Cardiology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact