Thomas Ried

587 citations
7 papers · 355 · h-index 6

Impact in

Papers in

    • Genomic variations and chromosomal abnormalities 4
    • Genetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders 1
    • Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics 3

Thomas Ried

7 papers receiving 340 citations

Peers

Thomas Ried
Comparison fields: 5 of 56
  • Cancer Research 88
  • Genetics 126
  • Molecular Biology 221
  • Oncology 76
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 47
Replace Björn Fritz with:
Björn Fritz Germany
Pauline A.M. Roest Netherlands
Frederik Van Dyck Belgium
Sabine Pagès-Berhouet France
Weihong Xu United States
Michiho Nishioka Japan
Yoko Sekita Japan
Claude Houdayer France
Jenny Varley United Kingdom
Thomas Ried relative to Björn Fritz Germany Björn Fritz's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Björn Fritz · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Thomas Ried

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas Ried's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas Ried with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas Ried more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas Ried

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas Ried. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas Ried. The network helps show where Thomas Ried may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Thomas Ried, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Thomas Ried Line = papers co-authored together Thomas Ried links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

7 of 7 papers shown
#Work
1
Patterns of chromosomal imbalances in adenocarcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma of the lung.
1997218
2 199344
3 199236
4 199824
5
Interphase cytogenetics and its role in molecular diagnostics of solid tumors.
199819
6 20009
7 19975

About Thomas Ried

Thomas Ried is a scholar working on Genetics, Cancer Research, Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Plant Science and Surgery, having authored 7 papers that have together received 355 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Genomic variations and chromosomal abnormalities (4 papers), Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics (3 papers), Genetic factors in colorectal cancer (2 papers), Chromosomal and Genetic Variations (2 papers), Cholangiocarcinoma and Gallbladder Cancer Studies (1 paper), Cardiomyopathy and Myosin Studies (1 paper), Nuclear Structure and Function (1 paper) and Genetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Cancer Research (88 citations), Genetics (126 citations), Molecular Biology (221 citations), Oncology (76 citations) and Pathology and Forensic Medicine (47 citations). Thomas Ried has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Germany and Sweden. Frequent co-authors include Manfred Dietel, Martin Reichel, Simone Petersen, Stanislas du Manoir, Martin Bujard, Klaus Gellert, Iver Petersen, Holger Langreck, G.‐U. WOLF and Anke Schwendel. Their work appears in journals such as Genomics, American Journal of Psychiatry, Genes Chromosomes and Cancer, Cancer Genetics and Cytogenetics and PubMed.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact