Thomas R. Porter

600 total citations
9 papers, 486 citations indexed

About

Thomas R. Porter is a scholar working on Biomedical Engineering, Surgery and Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging. According to data from OpenAlex, Thomas R. Porter has authored 9 papers receiving a total of 486 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 7 papers in Biomedical Engineering, 4 papers in Surgery and 3 papers in Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging. Recurrent topics in Thomas R. Porter's work include Ultrasound and Hyperthermia Applications (6 papers), Photoacoustic and Ultrasonic Imaging (5 papers) and Hemodynamic Monitoring and Therapy (2 papers). Thomas R. Porter is often cited by papers focused on Ultrasound and Hyperthermia Applications (6 papers), Photoacoustic and Ultrasonic Imaging (5 papers) and Hemodynamic Monitoring and Therapy (2 papers). Thomas R. Porter collaborates with scholars based in United States. Thomas R. Porter's co-authors include Feng Xie, David Kricsfeld, Robert Armbruster, Alan Kricsfeld, Feng Xie, Robert F. LeVeen, Shouping Li, Ubeydullah Deligönül, J.V. Nixon and James R. Anderson and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of the American College of Cardiology, The American Journal of Cardiology and American Heart Journal.

In The Last Decade

Thomas R. Porter

9 papers receiving 464 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Thomas R. Porter United States 8 360 236 117 79 75 9 486
Karen Kilzer United States 13 208 0.6× 208 0.9× 171 1.5× 53 0.7× 42 0.6× 23 438
Alan Kricsfeld United States 7 243 0.7× 157 0.7× 105 0.9× 48 0.6× 46 0.6× 11 336
Gustavo Camarano United States 12 419 1.2× 562 2.4× 386 3.3× 183 2.3× 131 1.7× 17 780
Tadamichi Sakuma Japan 10 135 0.4× 264 1.1× 250 2.1× 180 2.3× 42 0.6× 17 433
Thomas M. Peterson United States 10 299 0.8× 90 0.4× 65 0.6× 69 0.9× 27 0.4× 12 415
Pravin Shah Nepal 4 134 0.4× 128 0.5× 151 1.3× 66 0.8× 45 0.6× 9 397
Gerson S. Lichtenberg United States 8 134 0.4× 180 0.8× 269 2.3× 108 1.4× 54 0.7× 12 431
João Sbano Brazil 10 120 0.3× 122 0.5× 139 1.2× 83 1.1× 42 0.6× 25 280
Stephan von Bardeleben Germany 11 90 0.3× 384 1.6× 544 4.6× 121 1.5× 79 1.1× 22 662
Andrea V Brasch United States 10 113 0.3× 86 0.4× 200 1.7× 89 1.1× 19 0.3× 14 359

Countries citing papers authored by Thomas R. Porter

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas R. Porter's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas R. Porter with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas R. Porter more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas R. Porter

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas R. Porter. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas R. Porter. The network helps show where Thomas R. Porter may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Thomas R. Porter

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Thomas R. Porter. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Thomas R. Porter based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Thomas R. Porter. Thomas R. Porter is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

9 of 9 papers shown
3.
Porter, Thomas R., et al.. (1996). Thrombolytic enhancement with perfluorocarbon-exposed sonicated dextrose albumin microbubbles. American Heart Journal. 132(5). 964–968. 129 indexed citations
4.
Porter, Thomas R., Feng Xie, David Kricsfeld, & Robert Armbruster. (1996). Improved myocardial contrast with second harmonic transient ultrasound response imaging in humans using intravenous perfluorocarbon-exposed sonicated dextrose albumin. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 27(6). 1497–1501. 161 indexed citations
5.
Porter, Thomas R., et al.. (1996). Increased ultrasound contrast and decreased microbubble destruction rates with triggered ultrasound imaging. Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography. 9(5). 599–605. 65 indexed citations
6.
Porter, Thomas R., Alan Kricsfeld, Ubeydullah Deligönül, & Feng Xie. (1996). Detection of regional perfusion abnormalities during adenosine stress echocardiography with intravenous perfluorocarbon-exposed sonicated dextrose albumin. American Heart Journal. 132(1). 41–47. 10 indexed citations
7.
Porter, Thomas R., et al.. (1994). Left ventricular volume changes during dobutamine stress echocardiography identify patients with more extensive coronary artery disease. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 24(5). 1268–1273. 38 indexed citations
8.
Porter, Thomas R., et al.. (1994). Multifold Sonicated Dilutions of Albumin With Fifty Percent Dextrose Improve Left Ventricular Contrast Videointensity After Intravenous Injection in Human Beings. Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography. 7(5). 465–471. 3 indexed citations
9.
Porter, Thomas R., et al.. (1992). Transesophageal echocardiography to assess mitral valve function and flow during cardiopulmonary resuscitation. The American Journal of Cardiology. 70(11). 1056–1060. 47 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026