Thomas R. Kelly
- Surgery top 5%
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine top 5%
- Oncology top 10%
- Nephrology top 5%
- Emergency Medicine top 5%
- Co-authors
- D. WagnerJames BuxbaumJanice FlanaganIvan A. GradisarR. J. GrossPeter D. BlockJacques GilloteauxFrank W. Sellke
- Topics
- Pancreatitis Pathology and Treatment (15 papers)Gallbladder and Bile Duct Disorders (12 papers)Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research (9 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesAustraliaNew Zealand
In The Last Decade
Thomas R. Kelly
45 papers receiving 1.1k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 95
- Surgery 914
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 608
- Oncology 349
- Nephrology 123
- Emergency Medicine 99
Countries citing papers authored by Thomas R. Kelly
This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas R. Kelly's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas R. Kelly with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas R. Kelly more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas R. Kelly
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas R. Kelly. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas R. Kelly. The network helps show where Thomas R. Kelly may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Thomas R. Kelly
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Thomas R. Kelly. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Thomas R. Kelly based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Thomas R. Kelly. Thomas R. Kelly is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 91 | |
| 2 | 101 | |
| 3 | 11 | |
| 4 | 8 | |
| 5 | 12 | |
| 6 | 5 | |
| 7 | 5 | |
| 8 | 9 | |
| 9 | 29 | |
| 10 | 27 | |
| 11 | Management of gallstone pancreatitis during pregnancy and the postpartum period. | 37 |
| 12 | 28 | |
| 13 | Gallstone pancreatitis: the second time around. | 48 |
| 14 | Gallstone pancreatitis: the timing of surgery. | 117 |
| 15 | 21 | |
| 16 | 38 | |
| 17 | 9 | |
| 18 | 0 | |
| 19 | 7 | |
| 20 | 1 |
About Thomas R. Kelly
Thomas R. Kelly is a scholar working on Nephrology, Surgery and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, having authored 47 papers that have together received 1.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Pancreatitis Pathology and Treatment (15 papers), Gallbladder and Bile Duct Disorders (12 papers) and Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research (9 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Surgery (914 citations), Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (608 citations) and Nephrology (123 citations). Thomas R. Kelly has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Australia and New Zealand. Frequent co-authors include D. Wagner, James Buxbaum, Janice Flanagan, Ivan A. Gradisar, R. J. Gross, Peter D. Block, Jacques Gilloteaux, Frank W. Sellke, William H. Falor and Joseph Zarconi. Their work appears in journals such as New England Journal of Medicine, Annals of Surgery and The American Journal of Gastroenterology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.