Thomas Quint

642 citations
29 papers · 333 · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

Thomas Quint

28 papers receiving 308 citations

Peers

Thomas Quint
Comparison fields: 5 of 66
  • Management Science and Operations Research 159
  • Economics and Econometrics 188
  • Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design 16
  • Computational Theory and Mathematics 42
  • Media Technology 20
Replace Rudolf Henn with:
Rudolf Henn Germany
Wamiliana Wamiliana Indonesia
Birgit Rudloff United States
Terje Hansen Norway
Mourad Baı̈ou France
Balder Von Hohenbalken Canada
Walter Stromquist United States
Hans-Jakob Lüthi Switzerland
Malcolm Pemberton United Kingdom
Elisenda Molina Spain
Thomas Quint relative to Rudolf Henn Germany Rudolf Henn's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×15×20×
Rudolf Henn · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Thomas Quint

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas Quint's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas Quint with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas Quint more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas Quint

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas Quint. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas Quint. The network helps show where Thomas Quint may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 8 scholars most cited alongside Thomas Quint, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Thomas Quint Line = papers co-authored together Thomas Quint links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 29 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200164
2 199850
3 199131
4 199924
5 199715
6 199713
7 201811
8 199111
9 199610
10 199110
11 202110
12 20069
13 19979
14 19948
15 20138
16 20037
17 20047
18 20017
19 20186
20 19945

About Thomas Quint

Thomas Quint is a scholar working on Economics and Econometrics, Management Science and Operations Research, Computational Theory and Mathematics, Computer Networks and Communications and Media Technology, having authored 29 papers that have together received 333 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Game Theory and Voting Systems (14 papers), Economic theories and models (9 papers), Game Theory and Applications (8 papers), Auction Theory and Applications (6 papers), Computational Geometry and Mesh Generation (4 papers), ICT Impact and Policies (4 papers), Cognitive Radio Networks and Spectrum Sensing (3 papers) and Healthcare Policy and Management (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Management Science and Operations Research (159 citations), Economics and Econometrics (188 citations), Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design (16 citations), Computational Theory and Mathematics (42 citations) and Media Technology (20 citations). Thomas Quint has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Japan. Frequent co-authors include Martín Shubik, Hideo Konishi, Murat Yüksel, Naim Kapucu, İsmail Güvenç, Walid Saad, Walid Saad and Arvind Merwaday. Their work appears in journals such as International Journal of Game Theory, Mathematical Social Sciences, Games and Economic Behavior, Mathematical and Computer Modelling and Discrete Applied Mathematics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact