Thomas Polak

2.1k total citations
50 papers, 1.3k citations indexed

About

Thomas Polak is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Neurology and Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging. According to data from OpenAlex, Thomas Polak has authored 50 papers receiving a total of 1.3k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 31 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience, 22 papers in Neurology and 10 papers in Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging. Recurrent topics in Thomas Polak's work include Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (16 papers), Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies (14 papers) and Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (12 papers). Thomas Polak is often cited by papers focused on Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (16 papers), Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies (14 papers) and Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (12 papers). Thomas Polak collaborates with scholars based in Germany, United States and Czechia. Thomas Polak's co-authors include Martin J. Herrmann, Andreas J. Fallgatter, Ann‐Christine Ehlis, Jürgen Deckert, Thomas Dresler, Tim Hahn, Julia Zeller, Michael M. Plichta, Andreas Bitsch and Laura Müller and has published in prestigious journals such as NeuroImage, Neurology and Annals of Neurology.

In The Last Decade

Thomas Polak

49 papers receiving 1.3k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Thomas Polak Germany 21 666 491 209 206 188 50 1.3k
Dazhi Yin China 20 679 1.0× 208 0.4× 394 1.9× 99 0.5× 51 0.3× 46 1.1k
Martin Göttlich Germany 16 560 0.8× 182 0.4× 177 0.8× 168 0.8× 39 0.2× 39 945
Yunting Zhang China 22 794 1.2× 178 0.4× 477 2.3× 182 0.9× 52 0.3× 45 1.5k
Crystal Franklin United States 18 535 0.8× 153 0.3× 212 1.0× 138 0.7× 34 0.2× 38 1.3k
Bernhard Baier Germany 25 927 1.4× 667 1.4× 144 0.7× 196 1.0× 35 0.2× 53 1.8k
Vanessa Nieratschker Germany 25 379 0.6× 179 0.4× 73 0.3× 201 1.0× 97 0.5× 63 1.4k
Janardhanan C. Narayanaswamy India 24 650 1.0× 417 0.8× 88 0.4× 204 1.0× 43 0.2× 130 1.7k
Beth R. Krauss United States 9 621 0.9× 161 0.3× 107 0.5× 78 0.4× 86 0.5× 14 1.2k
Susan B. Perlman United States 21 645 1.0× 96 0.2× 179 0.9× 258 1.3× 66 0.4× 38 1.6k
Michael Adamaszek Germany 13 373 0.6× 357 0.7× 101 0.5× 73 0.4× 31 0.2× 32 883

Countries citing papers authored by Thomas Polak

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas Polak's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas Polak with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas Polak more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas Polak

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas Polak. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas Polak. The network helps show where Thomas Polak may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Thomas Polak

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Thomas Polak. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Thomas Polak based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Thomas Polak. Thomas Polak is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
3.
Lauer, Martin, et al.. (2021). Factors associated with dropout in the longitudinal Vogel study of cognitive decline. European Journal of Neuroscience. 56(9). 5587–5600. 4 indexed citations
5.
Polak, Thomas, et al.. (2021). Can smoking cessation be taught online? A prospective study comparing e-learning and role-playing in medical education. International Journal of Medical Education. 12. 12–21. 8 indexed citations
6.
Lauer, Martin, et al.. (2020). Neuronal correlates of the visual-spatial processing measured with functional near-infrared spectroscopy in healthy elderly individuals. Neuropsychologia. 148. 107650–107650. 8 indexed citations
7.
Stopper, Helga, Thomas Polak, Martin Lauer, et al.. (2020). Micronucleus frequency in buccal mucosa cells of patients with neurodegenerative diseases. Scientific Reports. 10(1). 22196–22196. 9 indexed citations
8.
Zeller, Julia, Laura Müller, Florian B. Haeussinger, et al.. (2018). Reduced spontaneous low frequency oscillations as measured with functional near-infrared spectroscopy in mild cognitive impairment. Brain Imaging and Behavior. 13(1). 283–292. 29 indexed citations
9.
Polak, Thomas, et al.. (2018). Augmentation of Fear Extinction by Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS). Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience. 12. 76–76. 48 indexed citations
10.
Herrmann, Martin J., et al.. (2018). Modulation of sustained fear by transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) of the right inferior frontal cortex (rIFC). Biological Psychology. 139. 173–177. 14 indexed citations
11.
Polak, Thomas, Martin J. Herrmann, Laura Müller, et al.. (2017). Near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) and vagus somatosensory evoked potentials (VSEP) in the early diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease: rationale, design, methods, and first baseline data of the Vogel study. Journal of Neural Transmission. 124(11). 1473–1488. 16 indexed citations
12.
Herrmann, Martin J., et al.. (2017). Relevance of Dorsolateral and Frontotemporal Cortex on the Phonemic Verbal Fluency – A fNIRS-Study. Neuroscience. 367. 169–177. 20 indexed citations
13.
Mühlberger, Andreas, et al.. (2016). Transcranial direct current stimulation of the prefrontal cortex increases attention to visual target stimuli. Journal of Neural Transmission. 123(10). 1195–1203. 20 indexed citations
14.
Herrmann, Martin J., et al.. (2016). Medial prefrontal cortex stimulation accelerates therapy response of exposure therapy in acrophobia. Brain stimulation. 10(2). 291–297. 77 indexed citations
15.
Guhn, Anne, Thomas Dresler, Marta Andreatta, et al.. (2014). Medial prefrontal cortex stimulation modulates the processing of conditioned fear. Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience. 8. 44–44. 60 indexed citations
16.
Metzger, Florian G., et al.. (2012). Vagus Somatosensory Evoked Potentials A Possibility for Diagnostic Improvement in Patients with Mild Cognitive Impairment. Dementia and Geriatric Cognitive Disorders. 33(5). 289–296. 12 indexed citations
17.
Zeller, Julia, Martin J. Herrmann, Ann‐Christine Ehlis, Thomas Polak, & Andreas J. Fallgatter. (2010). Altered Parietal Brain Oxygenation in Alzheimer's Disease as Assessed With Near-Infrared Spectroscopy. American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry. 18(5). 433–441. 50 indexed citations
18.
Polak, Thomas, et al.. (2009). Far field potentials from brain stem after transcutaneous Vagus nerve stimulation: optimization of stimulation and recording parameters. Journal of Neural Transmission. 116(10). 1237–1242. 72 indexed citations
19.
Polak, Thomas, Ann‐Christine Ehlis, J. Langer, et al.. (2007). Non-invasive measurement of vagus activity in the brainstem – a methodological progress towards earlier diagnosis of dementias?. Journal of Neural Transmission. 114(5). 613–619. 33 indexed citations
20.
Polak, Thomas, et al.. (2006). Brainstem Vagus nuclei evoked potentials – a new diagnostic method in neuropsychiatry?. Nervenheilkunde. 25. 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026