Thomas Piper
Impact in
-
- Hormonal and reproductive studies
- Toxicology top 1%
- Forensic Toxicology and Drug Analysis
Papers in
-
- Hormonal and reproductive studies 60
-
- Forensic Toxicology and Drug Analysis 7
- Co-authors
- Mario ThevisWilhelm SchänzerHans GeyerUlrich FlenkerF. M. PropstUte MareckAndreas ThomasMartial Saugy
- Journals
- Drug Testing and Analysis (31 papers)Rapid Communications in Mass Spectrometry (15 papers)Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry (7 papers)Analytical Chemistry (3 papers)Journal of Applied Physiology (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- GermanySwitzerlandAustralia
In The Last Decade
Thomas Piper
79 papers receiving 1.6k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 116
- Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism 1.1k
- Toxicology 159
- Animal Science and Zoology 377
- Cell Biology 555
- Spectroscopy 357
Countries citing papers authored by Thomas Piper
This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas Piper's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas Piper with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas Piper more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas Piper
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas Piper. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas Piper. The network helps show where Thomas Piper may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Thomas Piper, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2025 | 0 | |
| 2 | 2025 | 0 | |
| 3 | 2025 | 0 | |
| 4 | 2025 | 0 | |
| 5 | 2023 | 3 | |
| 6 | 2022 | 3 | |
| 7 | 2022 | 3 | |
| 8 | 2018 | 17 | |
| 9 | Several possible toxicological and genetic tools for the extension of the detection window after GHB intake | 2017 | 1 |
| 10 | 2017 | 6 | |
| 11 | 2016 | 2 | |
| 12 | 2015 | 22 | |
| 13 | 2013 | 20 | |
| 14 | 2012 | 3 | |
| 15 | 2011 | 14 | |
| 16 | 2010 | 25 | |
| 17 | 2010 | 47 | |
| 18 | 2010 | 49 | |
| 19 | 2008 | 26 | |
| 20 | 2006 | 47 |
About Thomas Piper
Thomas Piper is a scholar working on Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Toxicology, Cell Biology, Animal Science and Zoology and Spectroscopy, having authored 85 papers that have together received 1.7k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Hormonal and reproductive studies (60 papers), Muscle metabolism and nutrition (31 papers), Mass Spectrometry Techniques and Applications (21 papers), Pharmacological Effects and Assays (17 papers), Analytical Chemistry and Chromatography (11 papers), Isotope Analysis in Ecology (7 papers), Forensic Toxicology and Drug Analysis (7 papers) and Metabolomics and Mass Spectrometry Studies (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism (1.1k citations), Toxicology (159 citations), Animal Science and Zoology (377 citations), Cell Biology (555 citations) and Spectroscopy (357 citations). Thomas Piper has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Switzerland and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Mario Thevis, Wilhelm Schänzer, Hans Geyer, Ulrich Flenker, F. M. Propst, Ute Mareck, Andreas Thomas, Martial Saugy, Gregor Fußhöller and Georg Opfermann. Their work appears in journals such as Drug Testing and Analysis, Rapid Communications in Mass Spectrometry, Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry, Analytical Chemistry and Journal of Applied Physiology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.