Thomas Piper

2.0k citations
85 papers · 1.7k indexed · h-index 24

Impact in

Papers in

Thomas Piper

79 papers receiving 1.6k citations

Peers

Thomas Piper
Comparison fields: 5 of 116
  • Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism 1.1k
  • Toxicology 159
  • Animal Science and Zoology 377
  • Cell Biology 555
  • Spectroscopy 357
Replace Tiia Kuuranne with:
Tiia Kuuranne Switzerland
Ulrike Werner Germany
Catherine J. McNeal United States
D. André d’Avignon United States
Chhabil Dass United States
Antonios Kyriakopoulos Germany
María Zervoú Greece
David A. Keire United States
C. Adrian M. Hogben United States
Joseph A. Hankin United States
Thomas Piper relative to Tiia Kuuranne Switzerland Tiia Kuuranne's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Tiia Kuuranne · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Thomas Piper

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas Piper's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas Piper with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas Piper more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas Piper

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas Piper. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas Piper. The network helps show where Thomas Piper may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Thomas Piper, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Thomas Piper Line = papers co-authored together Thomas Piper links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20250
2 20250
3 20250
4 20250
5 20233
6 20223
7 20223
8 201817
9
Several possible toxicological and genetic tools for the extension of the detection window after GHB intake
20171
10 20176
11 20162
12 201522
13 201320
14 20123
15 201114
16 201025
17 201047
18 201049
19 200826
20 200647

About Thomas Piper

Thomas Piper is a scholar working on Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Toxicology, Cell Biology, Animal Science and Zoology and Spectroscopy, having authored 85 papers that have together received 1.7k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Hormonal and reproductive studies (60 papers), Muscle metabolism and nutrition (31 papers), Mass Spectrometry Techniques and Applications (21 papers), Pharmacological Effects and Assays (17 papers), Analytical Chemistry and Chromatography (11 papers), Isotope Analysis in Ecology (7 papers), Forensic Toxicology and Drug Analysis (7 papers) and Metabolomics and Mass Spectrometry Studies (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism (1.1k citations), Toxicology (159 citations), Animal Science and Zoology (377 citations), Cell Biology (555 citations) and Spectroscopy (357 citations). Thomas Piper has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Switzerland and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Mario Thevis, Wilhelm Schänzer, Hans Geyer, Ulrich Flenker, F. M. Propst, Ute Mareck, Andreas Thomas, Martial Saugy, Gregor Fußhöller and Georg Opfermann. Their work appears in journals such as Drug Testing and Analysis, Rapid Communications in Mass Spectrometry, Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry, Analytical Chemistry and Journal of Applied Physiology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026