Thomas Piercy

419 total citations
8 papers, 220 citations indexed

About

Thomas Piercy is a scholar working on Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience and Clinical Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Thomas Piercy has authored 8 papers receiving a total of 220 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 5 papers in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, 4 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience and 3 papers in Clinical Psychology. Recurrent topics in Thomas Piercy's work include Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum Disorders (3 papers), Body Image and Dysmorphia Studies (3 papers) and Cognitive Abilities and Testing (3 papers). Thomas Piercy is often cited by papers focused on Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum Disorders (3 papers), Body Image and Dysmorphia Studies (3 papers) and Cognitive Abilities and Testing (3 papers). Thomas Piercy collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, Switzerland and Portugal. Thomas Piercy's co-authors include Barbara J. Sahakian, George Savulich, John Suckling, James B. Rowe, John T. O’Brien, Chris Fox, Annette Beatrix Brühl, Jennifer Cook, Jesús Pérez and Peter B. Jones and has published in prestigious journals such as Scientific Reports, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences and Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics.

In The Last Decade

Thomas Piercy

7 papers receiving 212 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Thomas Piercy United Kingdom	6	106	85	61	40	32	8	220
Elizabeth Grinspoon United States	7	61 0.6×	76 0.9×	71 1.2×	42 1.1×	8 0.3×	16	195
Shuo Qin United States	9	57 0.5×	136 1.6×	111 1.8×	13 0.3×	12 0.4×	24	265
Alfonso Pitarque Spain	12	139 1.3×	232 2.7×	51 0.8×	23 0.6×	7 0.2×	53	362
Lisa Whipple Drozdick United States	8	76 0.7×	81 1.0×	52 0.9×	29 0.7×	3 0.1×	11	213
Dionysia Kontaxopoulou Greece	10	82 0.8×	60 0.7×	33 0.5×	14 0.3×	7 0.2×	23	252
Laura E. Korthauer United States	8	39 0.4×	129 1.5×	37 0.6×	15 0.4×	3 0.1×	24	263
Vanessa Evans Canada	8	75 0.7×	82 1.0×	121 2.0×	33 0.8×	3 0.1×	17	317
Martin Asperholm Sweden	6	55 0.5×	102 1.2×	81 1.3×	16 0.4×	6 0.2×	9	232
Boris Karpov Finland	11	140 1.3×	130 1.5×	55 0.9×	162 4.0×	4 0.1×	16	378

Countries citing papers authored by Thomas Piercy

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas Piercy's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas Piercy with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas Piercy more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas Piercy

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas Piercy. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas Piercy. The network helps show where Thomas Piercy may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Thomas Piercy

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Thomas Piercy. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Thomas Piercy based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Thomas Piercy. Thomas Piercy is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

8 of 8 papers shown

Banca, Paula, María Herrojo Ruiz, M. Fernando González-Zalba, et al.. (2024). Action sequence learning, habits, and automaticity in obsessive-compulsive disorder. eLife. 12.

Banca, Paula, María Herrojo Ruiz, M. Fernando González-Zalba, et al.. (2023). Action sequence learning, habits, and automaticity in obsessive-compulsive disorder. eLife. 12. 1 indexed citations

Banca, Paula, Daniel McNamee, Thomas Piercy, Qiang Luo, & Trevor W. Robbins. (2020). A Mobile Phone App for the Generation and Characterization of Motor Habits. Frontiers in Psychology. 10. 2850–2850. 6 indexed citations

Savulich, George, et al.. (2019). Improvements in Attention Following Cognitive Training With the Novel “Decoder” Game on an iPad. Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience. 13. 2–2. 16 indexed citations

Jalal, Baland, Annette Beatrix Brühl, Claire O’Callaghan, et al.. (2018). Novel Smartphone Interventions Improve Cognitive Flexibility and Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder Symptoms in Individuals with Contamination Fears. Scientific Reports. 8(1). 14923–14923. 14 indexed citations

Savulich, George, Thomas Piercy, Chris Fox, et al.. (2017). Cognitive Training Using a Novel Memory Game on an iPad in Patients with Amnestic Mild Cognitive Impairment (aMCI). The International Journal of Neuropsychopharmacology. 20(8). 624–633. 102 indexed citations

Savulich, George, Thomas Piercy, Annette Beatrix Brühl, et al.. (2016). Focusing the Neuroscience and Societal Implications of Cognitive Enhancers. Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics. 101(2). 170–172. 16 indexed citations

Sahakian, Barbara J., Annette Beatrix Brühl, Jennifer Cook, et al.. (2015). The impact of neuroscience on society: cognitive enhancement in neuropsychiatric disorders and in healthy people. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences. 370(1677). 20140214–20140214. 65 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact