Thomas Ots

572 citations
54 papers · 262 · h-index 8

Impact in

Papers in

Thomas Ots

30 papers receiving 222 citations

Peers

Thomas Ots
Comparison fields: 5 of 80
  • Complementary and alternative medicine 95
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 57
  • Pharmacy 17
  • Social Psychology 51
  • Urology 16
Replace Erman Bağcıoğlu with:
Erman Bağcıoğlu Türkiye
Johanna Carlsson Sweden
Wolfgang Milch Germany
Eugenia Chan United States
A. A. Mason United Kingdom
Nadia Ellis United Kingdom
Liyuan Huang China
E Targ United States
Veronica Quinn Australia
Tenzin Wangyal United States
Thomas Ots relative to Erman Bağcıoğlu Türkiye Erman Bağcıoğlu's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.9×
Erman Bağcıoğlu · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Thomas Ots

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas Ots's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas Ots with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas Ots more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas Ots

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas Ots. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas Ots. The network helps show where Thomas Ots may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 17 scholars most cited alongside Thomas Ots, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Thomas Ots Line = papers co-authored together Thomas Ots links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 54 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1990107
2 201732
3 202024
4
Phenomenology of the Body The Subject-Object Problem in Psychosomatic Medicine and the Role of Traditional Medical Systems herein
199115
5 201514
6 20128
7 20077
8 20097
9 20135
10 20134
11 20073
12 20013
13 20173
14 20092
15 20092
16 20172
17 20132
18 20142
19 20102
20 20162

About Thomas Ots

Thomas Ots is a scholar working on Complementary and alternative medicine, Psychiatry and Mental health, Surgery, Social Psychology and Cell Biology, having authored 54 papers that have together received 262 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Acupuncture Treatment Research Studies (25 papers), Complementary and Alternative Medicine Studies (10 papers), Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments (8 papers), Psychology, Coaching, and Therapy (6 papers), Biomedical and Chemical Research (5 papers), Myofascial pain diagnosis and treatment (5 papers), Mental Health and Psychiatry (3 papers) and Antioxidants, Aging, Portulaca oleracea (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Complementary and alternative medicine (95 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (57 citations), Pharmacy (17 citations), Social Psychology (51 citations) and Urology (16 citations). Thomas Ots has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Austria and United States. Frequent co-authors include Yan Liu, Zhishun Liu, Susan M. DiGiacomo, Andreas Sandner‐Kiesling, Istvan-Szilard Szilagyi, David Mayor, Judith M. Schlaeger, Diana J. Wilkie, Chang Gyu Park and Florian Beißner. Their work appears in journals such as Deutsche Zeitschrift für Akupunktur, Acupuncture in Medicine, Culture Medicine and Psychiatry and Revista Internacional de Acupuntura.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact