Thomas Onak

2.4k citations
113 papers · 1.5k · h-index 18

Impact in

Papers in

Thomas Onak

110 papers receiving 1.3k citations

Peers

Thomas Onak
Comparison fields: 5 of 70
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 906
  • Inorganic Chemistry 434
  • Physical and Theoretical Chemistry 237
  • Organic Chemistry 553
  • Radiation 166
Replace Fred N. Tebbe with:
Fred N. Tebbe United States
Michael Buehl United Kingdom
C. Hackett Bushweller United States
Joachim Stach Germany
Peter Paetzold Germany
F. P. Boer United States
E.F. Mooney United Kingdom
Maitland Jones United States
Harold R. Ward United States
Armin Berndt Germany
Thomas Onak relative to Fred N. Tebbe United States Fred N. Tebbe's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.5×
Fred N. Tebbe · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Thomas Onak

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas Onak's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas Onak with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas Onak more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas Onak

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas Onak. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas Onak. The network helps show where Thomas Onak may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Thomas Onak, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Thomas Onak Line = papers co-authored together Thomas Onak links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 113 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1959201
2 199164
3 196052
4 196452
5 199650
6 199945
7 199141
8 196238
9 199535
10 197034
11 199333
12 196330
13 199429
14 195828
15 196826
16 197024
17 196620
18 199317
19 197317
20 196317

About Thomas Onak

Thomas Onak is a scholar working on Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Radiation, Organic Chemistry, Spectroscopy and Materials Chemistry, having authored 113 papers that have together received 1.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Boron Compounds in Chemistry (83 papers), Nuclear Physics and Applications (34 papers), Radiopharmaceutical Chemistry and Applications (24 papers), Advanced NMR Techniques and Applications (21 papers), Organoboron and organosilicon chemistry (19 papers), Radioactive element chemistry and processing (14 papers), Boron and Carbon Nanomaterials Research (13 papers) and Chemical Synthesis and Characterization (8 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (906 citations), Inorganic Chemistry (434 citations), Physical and Theoretical Chemistry (237 citations), Organic Chemistry (553 citations) and Radiation (166 citations). Thomas Onak has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Germany. Frequent co-authors include I. Shapiro, Robert Williams, Herbert Landesman, Gary B. Dunks, John B. Leach, R. E. Williams, Michael E. Barfield, Henry Rapoport, Joachin Arias and Neil A. Hughes. Their work appears in journals such as Inorganic Chemistry, Journal of the American Chemical Society, Journal of Organometallic Chemistry, The Journal of Chemical Physics and The Journal of Physical Chemistry.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact