Thomas O’Connell
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 10%
- Visual perception and processing mechanisms 5
- Face Recognition and Perception 2
- Functional Brain Connectivity Studies 2
-
- Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research 2
-
- Gaze Tracking and Assistive Technology 3
-
- Visual Attention and Saliency Detection 6
- Advanced Vision and Imaging 2
-
- Landfill Environmental Impact Studies 1
- Co-authors
- Marvin M. ChunScott W. JohnsonStephanie ClineElizabeth MerikleFerenc MartényiMatthew DavisKit N. SimpsonMonica D. Rosenberg
- Journals
- Journal of Vision (5 papers)Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience (1 paper)PLoS Computational Biology (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesCanadaDominican Republic
In The Last Decade
Thomas O’Connell
9 papers receiving 280 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 90
- Cognitive Neuroscience 134
- Psychiatry and Mental health 85
- Geriatrics and Gerontology 19
- Human-Computer Interaction 18
- Neurology 27
Countries citing papers authored by Thomas O’Connell
This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas O’Connell's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas O’Connell with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas O’Connell more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas O’Connell
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas O’Connell. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas O’Connell. The network helps show where Thomas O’Connell may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Thomas O’Connell, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2025 | 0 | |
| 2 | 2023 | 0 | |
| 3 | 2022 | 1 | |
| 4 | 2020 | 6 | |
| 5 | 2019 | 1 | |
| 6 | 2018 | 25 | |
| 7 | 2018 | 5 | |
| 8 | 2018 | 78 | |
| 9 | 2018 | 148 | |
| 10 | 2015 | 18 | |
| 11 | 2012 | 4 | |
| 12 | Building a Better Intercom: Context-Mediated Communication within the Home | 2000 | 2 |
| 13 | Geosynthetic Sand Pack for Free Product Wells | 1995 | 1 |
About Thomas O’Connell
Thomas O’Connell is a scholar working on Human-Computer Interaction, Cognitive Neuroscience and Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, having authored 13 papers that have together received 289 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Visual Attention and Saliency Detection (6 papers), Visual perception and processing mechanisms (5 papers), Gaze Tracking and Assistive Technology (3 papers), Face Recognition and Perception (2 papers), Advanced Vision and Imaging (2 papers), Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (2 papers), Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (2 papers) and Landfill Environmental Impact Studies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Cognitive Neuroscience (134 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (85 citations) and Geriatrics and Gerontology (19 citations). Thomas O’Connell has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and Dominican Republic. Frequent co-authors include Marvin M. Chun, Scott W. Johnson, Stephanie Cline, Elizabeth Merikle, Ferenc Martényi, Matthew Davis, Kit N. Simpson, Monica D. Rosenberg, Wei-Ting Hsu and Kwangsun Yoo. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Vision, Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience, PLoS Computational Biology, Open Mind and Nature Communications.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.