Thomas Niebel
- Economics and Econometrics top 2%
- Media Technology top 1%
- Strategy and Management top 5%
- Information Systems top 5%
- Management Information Systems top 5%
- Co-authors
- Irene BertschekMarianne SaamWolfgang BriglauerKai HüschelrathMary O’MahonyFriedrich BreyerWen ChenAlexander Schiersch
- Topics
- ICT Impact and Policies (10 papers)Economic Growth and Productivity (8 papers)Digital Platforms and Economics (8 papers)
- Partner nations
- GermanyNetherlandsSwitzerland
In The Last Decade
Thomas Niebel
21 papers receiving 985 citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 72
- Economics and Econometrics 642
- Media Technology 294
- Strategy and Management 236
- Information Systems 178
- Management Information Systems 102
Countries citing papers authored by Thomas Niebel
This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas Niebel's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas Niebel with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas Niebel more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas Niebel
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas Niebel. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas Niebel. The network helps show where Thomas Niebel may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Thomas Niebel
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Thomas Niebel. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Thomas Niebel based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Thomas Niebel. Thomas Niebel is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 0 | |
| 4 | 1 | |
| 5 | 3 | |
| 6 | 5 | |
| 7 | 2 | |
| 8 | Monitoring Report DIGITAL Economy 2016 | 3 |
| 9 | On the Determinants of Cloud Computing Adoption | 0 |
| 10 | 47 | |
| 11 | 24 | |
| 12 | 73 | |
| 13 | 40 | |
| 14 | 70 | |
| 15 | 5 | |
| 16 | 6 | |
| 17 | Are intangibles more productive in ICT-intensive industries? : evidence from EU countries
\n | 2 |
| 18 | 48 | |
| 19 | 87 | |
| 20 | 2 |
About Thomas Niebel
Thomas Niebel is a scholar working on Media Technology, Strategy and Management and Economics and Econometrics, having authored 25 papers that have together received 1.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include ICT Impact and Policies (10 papers), Economic Growth and Productivity (8 papers) and Digital Platforms and Economics (8 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Media Technology (294 citations), Economics and Econometrics (642 citations) and Strategy and Management (236 citations). Thomas Niebel has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Netherlands and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include Irene Bertschek, Marianne Saam, Wolfgang Briglauer, Kai Hüschelrath, Mary O’Mahony, Friedrich Breyer, Wen Chen, Alexander Schiersch, Christian Rammer and Wen Chen. Their work appears in journals such as World Development, The Energy Journal and Telecommunications Policy.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.