Thomas Nester

830 citations
10 papers · 534 · h-index 7

Impact in

Papers in

Thomas Nester

8 papers receiving 520 citations

Peers

Thomas Nester
Comparison fields: 5 of 47
  • Water Science and Technology 361
  • Global and Planetary Change 448
  • Atmospheric Science 139
  • Environmental Engineering 60
  • Soil Science 24
Replace Klaus Vormoor with:
Klaus Vormoor Germany
Kazuhiko Fukami Japan
Anne Fleig Norway
Ryan S. Padrón Switzerland
Devanmini Halwatura Sri Lanka
K. Harvey Australia
Donna Wilson Norway
H. Niel France
Cristóbal Puelma Chile
Dinuke Munasinghe United States
Thomas Nester relative to Klaus Vormoor Germany Klaus Vormoor's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Klaus Vormoor · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Thomas Nester

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas Nester's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas Nester with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas Nester more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas Nester

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas Nester. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas Nester. The network helps show where Thomas Nester may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 17 scholars most cited alongside Thomas Nester, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Thomas Nester Line = papers co-authored together Thomas Nester links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

10 of 10 papers shown
#Work
1 2013197
2 2015141
3 201677
4 201238
5 201233
6 201129
7 201614
8 20084
9
Potential of alpine retention measures to reduce floods at the Inn river in Tyrol
20181
10 20130

About Thomas Nester

Thomas Nester is a scholar working on Water Science and Technology, Global and Planetary Change, Atmospheric Science, Ecology and Ocean Engineering, having authored 10 papers that have together received 534 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Hydrology and Watershed Management Studies (10 papers), Flood Risk Assessment and Management (8 papers), Hydrology and Drought Analysis (5 papers), Cryospheric studies and observations (2 papers), Climate variability and models (1 paper), Climate change and permafrost (1 paper), Hydrology and Sediment Transport Processes (1 paper) and Water resources management and optimization (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Water Science and Technology (361 citations), Global and Planetary Change (448 citations), Atmospheric Science (139 citations), Environmental Engineering (60 citations) and Soil Science (24 citations). Thomas Nester has collaborated with scholars based in Austria and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Günter Blöschl, Juraj Párajka, Jürgen Komma, Rui A. P. Perdigão, Alberto Viglione, R. Kirnbauer, Bruno Merz, Nguyễn Viết Dũng, Lenka Plavcová and Magdalena Rogger. Their work appears in journals such as Water Resources Research, Hydrology research, Journal of Hydrology and Hydromechanics, Journal of Hydrology and Hydrology and earth system sciences.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact