Thomas Moore
- Biochemistry top 0.5%
- Lipid metabolism and biosynthesis 29
- Plant Science top 1%
- Plant nutrient uptake and metabolism 7
- Mycorrhizal Fungi and Plant Interactions 6
- Molecular Biology top 10%
- Photosynthetic Processes and Mechanisms 15
- Enzyme Catalysis and Immobilization 10
- Pharmacology top 5%
-
- Irish and British Studies 7
-
- Labor market dynamics and wage inequality 7
-
- Pancreatic function and diabetes 6
- Co-authors
- Martha ChristensenMichael F. AllenHarry BeeversT. KagawaJanet M. LordKent D. ChapmanJohn L. HarwoodWilliam K. Smith
- Journals
- PLANT PHYSIOLOGY (24 papers)Archives of Biochemistry and Biophysics (5 papers)Neurosurgery (3 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited KingdomSlovakia
In The Last Decade
Thomas Moore
103 papers receiving 2.6k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 162
- Biochemistry 609
- Plant Science 1.5k
- Molecular Biology 1.1k
- Pharmacology 217
- Nature and Landscape Conservation 152
Countries citing papers authored by Thomas Moore
This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas Moore's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas Moore with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas Moore more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas Moore
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas Moore. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas Moore. The network helps show where Thomas Moore may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Thomas Moore, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2009 | 0 | |
| 2 | Stalking the Soul: Emotional Abuse and the Erosion of Identity | 2000 | 20 |
| 3 | 1994 | 11 | |
| 4 | 1994 | 29 | |
| 5 | 1993 | 33 | |
| 6 | 1992 | 12 | |
| 7 | 1990 | 16 | |
| 8 | 1990 | 14 | |
| 9 | Phosphatidylcholine synthesis in castor bean endosperm. Metabolism of S-adenosylmethionine and ethanolamine | 1989 | 1 |
| 10 | 1989 | 6 | |
| 11 | 1988 | 11 | |
| 12 | 1987 | 25 | |
| 13 | 1985 | 14 | |
| 14 | 1981 | 18 | |
| 15 | 1979 | 34 | |
| 16 | 1978 | 18 | |
| 17 | 1975 | 20 | |
| 18 | 1974 | 22 | |
| 19 | 1973 | 80 | |
| 20 | The letters of Thomas Moore | 1964 | 3 |
About Thomas Moore
Thomas Moore is a scholar working on Biochemistry, Public Administration and Plant Science, having authored 118 papers that have together received 2.9k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Lipid metabolism and biosynthesis (29 papers), Photosynthetic Processes and Mechanisms (15 papers), Enzyme Catalysis and Immobilization (10 papers), Irish and British Studies (7 papers), Labor market dynamics and wage inequality (7 papers), Plant nutrient uptake and metabolism (7 papers), Mycorrhizal Fungi and Plant Interactions (6 papers) and Pancreatic function and diabetes (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Biochemistry (609 citations), Plant Science (1.5k citations) and Molecular Biology (1.1k citations). Thomas Moore has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Slovakia. Frequent co-authors include Martha Christensen, Michael F. Allen, Harry Beevers, T. Kagawa, Janet M. Lord, Kent D. Chapman, John L. Harwood, William K. Smith, Shang Fa Yang and Wai Kien Yip. Their work appears in journals such as PLANT PHYSIOLOGY, Archives of Biochemistry and Biophysics, Neurosurgery, Mycologia and Work and Occupations.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.