Thomas McPoil

540 total citations
7 papers, 420 citations indexed

About

Thomas McPoil is a scholar working on Orthopedics and Sports Medicine, Biomedical Engineering and Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism. According to data from OpenAlex, Thomas McPoil has authored 7 papers receiving a total of 420 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 7 papers in Orthopedics and Sports Medicine, 7 papers in Biomedical Engineering and 6 papers in Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism. Recurrent topics in Thomas McPoil's work include Lower Extremity Biomechanics and Pathologies (7 papers), Diabetic Foot Ulcer Assessment and Management (6 papers) and Foot and Ankle Surgery (4 papers). Thomas McPoil is often cited by papers focused on Lower Extremity Biomechanics and Pathologies (7 papers), Diabetic Foot Ulcer Assessment and Management (6 papers) and Foot and Ankle Surgery (4 papers). Thomas McPoil collaborates with scholars based in United States and Australia. Thomas McPoil's co-authors include Bill Vicenzino, Natalie J. Collins, Kay M. Crossley, Ross Darnell, Elaine Beller, Joshua Cleland, Joseph M. Molloy, Stephen L. Goffar, Douglas S. Christie and Deydre S. Teyhen and has published in prestigious journals such as British Journal of Sports Medicine, Clinical Biomechanics and Military Medicine.

In The Last Decade

Thomas McPoil

6 papers receiving 405 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Thomas McPoil United States 4 375 332 156 69 68 7 420
Rolf Scharfbillig Australia 9 305 0.8× 338 1.0× 168 1.1× 31 0.4× 67 1.0× 15 454
TG McPoil United States 11 307 0.8× 327 1.0× 220 1.4× 29 0.4× 55 0.8× 17 446
Naoko Aminaka United States 8 300 0.8× 281 0.8× 37 0.2× 43 0.6× 75 1.1× 11 348
Rebecca E. Snow United States 5 298 0.8× 265 0.8× 148 0.9× 28 0.4× 60 0.9× 10 402
Kevin A. Kirby United States 10 386 1.0× 387 1.2× 180 1.2× 20 0.3× 107 1.6× 21 513
TG McPoil United States 9 400 1.1× 335 1.0× 329 2.1× 34 0.5× 48 0.7× 13 502
Ian Griffiths United Kingdom 7 267 0.7× 297 0.9× 116 0.7× 22 0.3× 61 0.9× 10 351
Lisa T. Hoglund United States 8 272 0.7× 236 0.7× 37 0.2× 82 1.2× 74 1.1× 19 366
Caleb Wegener Australia 9 227 0.6× 187 0.6× 132 0.8× 39 0.6× 27 0.4× 15 298
Helen Branthwaite United Kingdom 11 231 0.6× 187 0.6× 158 1.0× 37 0.5× 16 0.2× 26 322

Countries citing papers authored by Thomas McPoil

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas McPoil's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas McPoil with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas McPoil more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas McPoil

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas McPoil. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas McPoil. The network helps show where Thomas McPoil may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Thomas McPoil

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Thomas McPoil. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Thomas McPoil based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Thomas McPoil. Thomas McPoil is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

7 of 7 papers shown
1.
Teyhen, Deydre S., et al.. (2010). Awareness and Compliance With Recommended Running Shoe Guidelines Among U.S. Army Soldiers. Military Medicine. 175(11). 847–854. 3 indexed citations
2.
Collins, Natalie J., Kay M. Crossley, Elaine Beller, et al.. (2009). Foot orthoses and physiotherapy in the treatment of patellofemoral pain syndrome: randomised clinical trial (Reprinted from BMJ, vol 337, pg a1735, 2008). British Journal of Sports Medicine. 43(3). 169–171. 36 indexed citations
3.
Teyhen, Deydre S., et al.. (2009). Dynamic plantar pressure parameters associated with static arch height index during gait. Clinical Biomechanics. 24(4). 391–396. 75 indexed citations
4.
Molloy, Joseph M., et al.. (2009). Effect of Running Shoe Type on the Distribution and Magnitude of Plantar Pressures in Individuals with Low- or High-Arched Feet ORIGINAL ARTICLES. 1 indexed citations
5.
Vicenzino, Bill, Natalie J. Collins, Joshua Cleland, & Thomas McPoil. (2008). A clinical prediction rule for identifying patients with patellofemoral pain who are likely to benefit from foot orthoses: a preliminary determination. British Journal of Sports Medicine. 44(12). 862–866. 80 indexed citations
6.
Collins, Natalie J., Kay M. Crossley, Elaine Beller, et al.. (2008). Foot orthoses and physiotherapy in the treatment of patellofemoral pain syndrome: randomised clinical trial. British Journal of Sports Medicine. 43(3). 163.2–168. 224 indexed citations
7.
Molloy, Joseph M., et al.. (2008). Influence of running shoe type on distribution and magnitude of plantar pressures among those with pes planus or pes cavus feet. Clinical Biomechanics. 23(5). 708–709. 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026