Countries citing papers authored by Thomas McFadden
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas McFadden's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas McFadden with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas McFadden more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas McFadden. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas McFadden. The network helps show where Thomas McFadden may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Thomas McFadden
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Thomas McFadden.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Thomas McFadden based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Thomas McFadden. Thomas McFadden is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
McFadden, Thomas, et al.. (2011). Nominative case is independent of finiteness and agreement.7 indexed citations
8.
McFadden, Thomas, et al.. (2010). Subject distribution and Finiteness in Tamil and Other Languages: selection vs. Case. 2(1).10 indexed citations
9.
McFadden, Thomas. (2007). Auxiliary Selection. Language and Linguistics Compass. 1(6). 674–708.10 indexed citations
10.
McFadden, Thomas. (2007). Default case and the status of compound categories in Distributed Morphology. Scholarly Commons (University of Pennsylvania). 13(1). 18.15 indexed citations
11.
McFadden, Thomas & Άρτεμις Αλεξιάδου. (2006). Counterfactuals and the Loss of BE in the History of English. Scholarly Commons (University of Pennsylvania). 12(1). 21.1 indexed citations
12.
McFadden, Thomas & Άρτεμις Αλεξιάδου. (2006). Pieces of the be Perfect in German andOlder English. Publication Server of Goethe University Frankfurt am Main (Goethe University Frankfurt). 270–278.4 indexed citations
13.
McFadden, Thomas & Άρτεμις Αλεξιάδου. (2005). Counterfactuals and BE in the History of English. 272–280.3 indexed citations
McFadden, Thomas. (2004). The position of morphological *case in the derivation: A study on the syntax -morphology interface. Scholarly Commons (University of Pennsylvania).133 indexed citations
16.
McFadden, Thomas. (2004). On the pronominal inflection of the Germanic strong adjective. Scholarly Commons (University of Pennsylvania). 10(1). 11.2 indexed citations
17.
McFadden, Thomas. (2003). On Morphological Case and Word-Order Freedom. Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society. 29(1). 295–295.5 indexed citations
18.
McFadden, Thomas. (2003). Adventures in Resolving Redundancy: Case vs. the EPP*. Scholarly Commons (University of Pennsylvania). 9(1). 11.4 indexed citations
19.
McFadden, Thomas. (2002). The Morphosyntax of Finno-Ugric Case-marking: a DM account. Scholarworks (University of Massachusetts Amherst). 32(2). 4.2 indexed citations
20.
Gillam, Ronald B., Thomas McFadden, & Anne Van Kleeck. (1995). Improving the Narrative Abilities ofChildren with Language Disorders: Whole Language and Language Skills Approaches. 145–182.11 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.