Thomas Mark

748 total citations
20 papers, 391 citations indexed

About

Thomas Mark is a scholar working on Genetics, Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism and Molecular Biology. According to data from OpenAlex, Thomas Mark has authored 20 papers receiving a total of 391 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 10 papers in Genetics, 7 papers in Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism and 4 papers in Molecular Biology. Recurrent topics in Thomas Mark's work include Genetic and phenotypic traits in livestock (8 papers), Diabetes Treatment and Management (7 papers) and Diabetes Management and Research (7 papers). Thomas Mark is often cited by papers focused on Genetic and phenotypic traits in livestock (8 papers), Diabetes Treatment and Management (7 papers) and Diabetes Management and Research (7 papers). Thomas Mark collaborates with scholars based in Denmark, United States and Canada. Thomas Mark's co-authors include Haja N. Kadarmideen, Duy Ngoc, Anders Bjerring Strathe, Just Jensen, Tage Ostersen, Mansoor Husain, Ildiko Lingvay, Anders G. Holst, Lisette J. A. Kogelman and Merete Fredholm and has published in prestigious journals such as PLoS ONE, Diabetes and Diabetes Obesity and Metabolism.

In The Last Decade

Thomas Mark

20 papers receiving 375 citations

Peers

Thomas Mark
Comparison fields: 5 of 80
  • Genetics 190
  • Molecular Biology 86
  • Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism 74
  • Cancer Research 61
  • Animal Science and Zoology 61
Replace Julie Hervé with:
Julie Hervé France
H Niedermüller Austria
Pablo U. Díaz Argentina
A. V. Makarevich Slovakia
Muren Herrid Australia
Akihiro Matsuura Japan
Yongbum Koo South Korea
Byoung‐Chul Yang South Korea
Jack Rose United States
Jerzy Galas Poland
Julie Hervé France View profile →
Citations per field, relative to Thomas Mark
Thomas Mark · 1×
Citations per year, relative to Thomas Mark
Thomas Mark · 1×

Countries citing papers authored by Thomas Mark

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas Mark's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas Mark with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas Mark more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas Mark

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas Mark. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas Mark. The network helps show where Thomas Mark may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Thomas Mark

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Thomas Mark. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Thomas Mark based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Thomas Mark. Thomas Mark is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
# Work Indexed citations
1 7
2 13
3 1
4 1
5 34
6 4
7 15
8 14
9 12
10 1
11 3
12 5
13 15
14 34
15 90
16
Genetic Correlations between Young Horse and Dressage Competition Results in Danish Warmblood Horses
2
17 72
18 34
19 10
20
What Every Pianist Needs to Know About the Body
24

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026