Thomas M. Karsten

814 citations
6 papers · 470 · h-index 6

Impact in

Papers in

Thomas M. Karsten

6 papers receiving 451 citations

Peers

Thomas M. Karsten
Comparison fields: 5 of 36
  • Oncology 230
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 202
  • Surgery 190
  • Hepatology 12
  • Cancer Research 22
Replace Dong Hyo Noh with:
Dong Hyo Noh South Korea
Robert M. Dy United States
Evelyne Bareck Austria
M. Janot Germany
Jang Yong Jeon South Korea
Enrico Sgotto Italy
Valentina Allegrini Italy
Selma J. Lekkerkerker Netherlands
Tomoaki Matsumori Japan
Yuan-Xing Gao China
Thomas M. Karsten relative to Dong Hyo Noh South Korea Dong Hyo Noh's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×15×
Dong Hyo Noh · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Thomas M. Karsten

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas M. Karsten's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas M. Karsten with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas M. Karsten more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas M. Karsten

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas M. Karsten. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas M. Karsten. The network helps show where Thomas M. Karsten may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Thomas M. Karsten, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Thomas M. Karsten Line = papers co-authored together Thomas M. Karsten links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

6 of 6 papers shown
#Work
1 2002298
2
Preoperative biliary drainage, colonisation of bile and postoperative complications in patients with tumours of the pancreatic head: a retrospective analysis of 241 consecutive patients.
199693
3
Morphologic changes of extrahepatic bile ducts during obstruction and subsequent decompression by endoprosthesis.
199240
4 199817
5 202115
6 20057

About Thomas M. Karsten

Thomas M. Karsten is a scholar working on Surgery, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Oncology and Cancer Research, having authored 6 papers that have together received 470 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Gallbladder and Bile Duct Disorders (2 papers), Pediatric Hepatobiliary Diseases and Treatments (2 papers), Cholangiocarcinoma and Gallbladder Cancer Studies (2 papers), Handwritten Text Recognition Techniques (1 paper), Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research (1 paper), MicroRNA in disease regulation (1 paper), Image Processing and 3D Reconstruction (1 paper) and Image Retrieval and Classification Techniques (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Oncology (230 citations), Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (202 citations), Surgery (190 citations), Hepatology (12 citations) and Cancer Research (22 citations). Thomas M. Karsten has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Martin H. Prins, Miguel E. Sewnath, Dirk J. Gouma, H. Obertop, T.M. van Gulik, Jan Hein Allema, L T de Wit, D.J. Gouma, G. N. J. Tytgat and Paul C.M. Verbeek. Their work appears in journals such as Annals of Surgery, Journal of Surgical Research, International Journal of Molecular Sciences, PubMed and Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact