Thomas Lorentzen

24 papers receiving 382 citations

Peers

Thomas Lorentzen
Comparison fields: 5 of 47
  • General Health Professions 181
  • Public Administration 25
  • Health 46
  • Political Science and International Relations 147
  • Demography 60
Replace Sandra Vegeris with:
Sandra Vegeris United Kingdom
Corinna Kleinert Germany
Anna Manzoni United States
Joan Payne United Kingdom
Yuliya Kosyakova Germany
Demetra Smith Nightingale United States
Siwei Cheng United States
Svenn‐Åge Dahl Norway
Flavia Fossati Switzerland
Karl Ashworth United Kingdom
Thomas Lorentzen relative to Sandra Vegeris United Kingdom Sandra Vegeris's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.9×
Sandra Vegeris · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Thomas Lorentzen

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas Lorentzen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas Lorentzen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas Lorentzen more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas Lorentzen

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas Lorentzen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas Lorentzen. The network helps show where Thomas Lorentzen may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Thomas Lorentzen, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Thomas Lorentzen Line = papers co-authored together Thomas Lorentzen links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 29 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201846
2 201445
3 200839
4 201536
5 200536
6 200334
7 200525
8 201223
9 201121
10 202021
11 201418
12 201813
13 202011
14 201811
15 201810
16
Social assistance dynamics in Norway: A sibling study of intergenerational mobility
20108
17 20147
18 20244
19 20214
20 20233

About Thomas Lorentzen

Thomas Lorentzen is a scholar working on Political Science and International Relations, General Health Professions, Sociology and Political Science, Gender Studies and Health, having authored 29 papers that have together received 421 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Social Policy and Reform Studies (15 papers), Employment and Welfare Studies (10 papers), Youth Education and Societal Dynamics (6 papers), Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics (5 papers), Health disparities and outcomes (4 papers), Labor market dynamics and wage inequality (4 papers), Retirement, Disability, and Employment (3 papers) and Advanced Causal Inference Techniques (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Health Professions (181 citations), Public Administration (25 citations), Health (46 citations), Political Science and International Relations (147 citations) and Demography (60 citations). Thomas Lorentzen has collaborated with scholars based in Norway, Sweden and Finland. Frequent co-authors include Espen Dahl, Olof Bäckman, Timo M. Kauppinen, Hans‐Tore Hansen, Tone Fløtten, Tapio Salonen, Pasi Moisio, Eva Österbacka, Tomas Korpi and Ivan Harsløf. Their work appears in journals such as International Journal of Social Welfare, Journal of European Social Policy, Journal of Education and Work, European Journal of Population / Revue européenne de Démographie and Psychological Medicine.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact