Thomas Leif
Impact in
-
- Social Policy and Reform Studies
- Populism, Right-Wing Movements
- Public Administration and Political Analysis
-
- Political Influence and Corporate Strategies
Papers in
-
- Public Administration and Political Analysis 3
- European history and politics 3
-
- German legal, social, and political studies 2
- Communism, Protests, Social Movements 2
- Sociology and Education Studies 1
- Co-authors
- Rudolf Speth (3 shared papers)Ansgar Klein (2 shared papers)Kai-Uwe Hellmann (1 shared paper)Markus Rohde (1 shared paper)Joachim Raschke (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Forschungsjournal Soziale Bewegungen (1 paper)Rowohlt eBooks (1 paper)VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften eBooks (3 papers)Medical Entomology and Zoology (1 paper)Westdeutscher Verlag eBooks (3 papers)
- Partner nations
- Germany
In The Last Decade
Thomas Leif
9 papers receiving 27 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 16
- Political Science and International Relations 21
- Strategy and Management 12
- Public Administration 2
- Communication 3
- Sociology and Political Science 18
Countries citing papers authored by Thomas Leif
This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas Leif's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas Leif with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas Leif more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas Leif
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas Leif. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas Leif. The network helps show where Thomas Leif may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 5 scholars most cited alongside Thomas Leif, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1999 | 13 | |
| 2 | Die fünfte Gewalt : Lobbyismus in Deutschland | 2006 | 6 |
| 3 | 2003 | 6 | |
| 4 | 1990 | 5 | |
| 5 | 2003 | 4 | |
| 6 | 1990 | 3 | |
| 7 | Rudolf Scharping, die SPD und die Macht : eine Partei wird besichtigt | 1994 | 1 |
| 8 | Reform des DGB : Herausforderungen, Aufbruchspläne und Modernisierungskonzepte | 1993 | 1 |
| 9 | Protestwähler und Wahlverweigerer : Krise der Demokratie? | 1992 | 1 |
| 10 | 1998 | 1 |
About Thomas Leif
Thomas Leif is a scholar working on Political Science and International Relations, Sociology and Political Science, Strategy and Management, Law and Infectious Diseases, having authored 10 papers that have together received 41 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Political Influence and Corporate Strategies (3 papers), Public Administration and Political Analysis (3 papers), European history and politics (3 papers), German legal, social, and political studies (2 papers), Communism, Protests, Social Movements (2 papers), Sociology and Education Studies (1 paper), Digitalization, Law, and Regulation (1 paper) and Law and Political Science (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Political Science and International Relations (21 citations), Strategy and Management (12 citations), Public Administration (2 citations), Communication (3 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (18 citations). Thomas Leif has collaborated with scholars based in Germany. Frequent co-authors include Rudolf Speth, Ansgar Klein, Kai-Uwe Hellmann, Markus Rohde and Joachim Raschke. Their work appears in journals such as Forschungsjournal Soziale Bewegungen, Rowohlt eBooks, VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften eBooks, Medical Entomology and Zoology and Westdeutscher Verlag eBooks.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.