431 total citations 85 papers, 196 citations indexed
About
Thomas L. Shaffer is a scholar working on Political Science and International Relations, Law and Sociology and Political Science.
According to data from OpenAlex, Thomas L. Shaffer has authored 85 papers receiving a total of 196 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 38 papers in Political Science and International Relations, 37 papers in Law and 8 papers in Sociology and Political Science. Recurrent topics in Thomas L. Shaffer's work include Legal Education and Practice Innovations (30 papers), Legal Systems and Judicial Processes (20 papers) and American Constitutional Law and Politics (16 papers). Thomas L. Shaffer is often cited by papers focused on Legal Education and Practice Innovations (30 papers), Legal Systems and Judicial Processes (20 papers) and American Constitutional Law and Politics (16 papers). Thomas L. Shaffer collaborates with scholars based in United States. Thomas L. Shaffer's co-authors include Lacey N. Wallace, William H. Simon, Stanley Hauerwas and Sandra H. Johnson and has published in prestigious journals such as Cell, SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología and The Yale Law Journal.
In The Last Decade
Thomas L. Shaffer
56 papers
receiving
127 citations
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
Countries citing papers authored by Thomas L. Shaffer
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas L. Shaffer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas L. Shaffer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas L. Shaffer more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas L. Shaffer
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas L. Shaffer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas L. Shaffer. The network helps show where Thomas L. Shaffer may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Thomas L. Shaffer
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Thomas L. Shaffer.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Thomas L. Shaffer based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Thomas L. Shaffer. Thomas L. Shaffer is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Shaffer, Thomas L.. (2012). The Legal Profession's Rule against Vouching for Clients: Advocacy and the Manner That Is the Man Himself. Notre Dame journal of law, ethics & public policy. 7(1). 145.2 indexed citations
2.
Shaffer, Thomas L.. (2012). Nuclear Weapons, Lethal Injection, and American Catholics: Faith Confronting American Civil Religion. Notre Dame journal of law, ethics & public policy. 14(1). 7.
3.
Shaffer, Thomas L.. (2007). A Search for Balance in the Whirlwind of Law School: Spirituality from Law Teachers. Saint Louis University law journal. 51(4). 13.1 indexed citations
4.
Shaffer, Thomas L.. (2003). The Biblical Prophets as Lawyers for the Poor. The Fordham urban law journal/Fordham urban law journal. 31(1). 15.1 indexed citations
5.
Shaffer, Thomas L.. (1998). The Christian Jurisprudence of Robert E. Rodes Jr.. The Notre Dame law review. 73(3). 737.1 indexed citations
6.
Shaffer, Thomas L.. (1998). Remarks, Symposium, Faith Tends to Subvert Legal Order. Fordham law review. 66(4). 1089.2 indexed citations
7.
Shaffer, Thomas L.. (1996). On Teaching Legal Ethics in the Law Office. The Notre Dame law review. 71(4). 605.2 indexed citations
8.
Shaffer, Thomas L., et al.. (1996). H. Jefferson Powell on the American Constitutional Tradition: A Conversation. The Notre Dame law review. 72(1). 11.1 indexed citations
9.
Shaffer, Thomas L., et al.. (1995). Lawyers as Strangers and Friends: A Reply to Professor Sammons. University of Arkansas at Little Rock law review. 18(1). 69.
10.
Shaffer, Thomas L.. (1995). Why Does the Church Have Law Schools. eYLS (Yale Law School). 78(2). 401.1 indexed citations
11.
Shaffer, Thomas L.. (1994). On Religious Legal Ethics. eYLS (Yale Law School). 35(4). 6.4 indexed citations
12.
Shaffer, Thomas L.. (1988). Unique, Novel, and Unsound Adversary Ethic. Vanderbilt law review. 41(4). 697.1 indexed citations
13.
Shaffer, Thomas L.. (1983). The Legal Ethics of the Two Kingdoms. Valparaiso University law review. 17(1). 1–39.1 indexed citations
14.
Shaffer, Thomas L.. (1982). Four Issues in the Accreditation of Law Schools. Journal of legal education. 32(2).
15.
Shaffer, Thomas L.. (1982). David Hoffman's Law School Lectures, 1822-1833.. Journal of legal education. 32(1).1 indexed citations
16.
Shaffer, Thomas L.. (1981). Henry Knox and the Moral Theology of Law Firms. Washington and Lee law review. 38(2). 347.1 indexed citations
17.
Shaffer, Thomas L.. (1979). Advocacy As Moral Discourse. North Carolina law review. 57(4). 647.2 indexed citations
18.
Shaffer, Thomas L., et al.. (1976). Learning the Law-Thoughts Toward a Human Perspective. The Notre Dame law review. 51(5). 956.4 indexed citations
19.
Shaffer, Thomas L., et al.. (1976). Mentally Retarded Citizen and the Law. eYLS (Yale Law School).14 indexed citations
20.
Shaffer, Thomas L.. (1969). Will Interviews, Young Family Clients and the Psychology of Testation. The Notre Dame law review. 44(3). 345.1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.