Thomas L. Mote
- Atmospheric Science top 0.2%
- Global and Planetary Change top 0.5%
- Environmental Engineering top 1%
- Oceanography top 5%
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine top 10%
- Co-authors
- Paul DixonJ. Marshall ShepherdXavier FettweisVittorio A. GensiniJamie DyerAndrew GrundsteinMarco TedescoJoshua D. Durkee
- Topics
- Climate variability and models (77 papers)Cryospheric studies and observations (68 papers)Meteorological Phenomena and Simulations (60 papers)
- Journals
- Nature CommunicationsSHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaJournal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres
- Partner nations
- United StatesBelgiumUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Thomas L. Mote
135 papers receiving 5.3k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 101
- Atmospheric Science 4.5k
- Global and Planetary Change 3.2k
- Environmental Engineering 719
- Oceanography 371
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 301
Countries citing papers authored by Thomas L. Mote
This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas L. Mote's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas L. Mote with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas L. Mote more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas L. Mote
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas L. Mote. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas L. Mote. The network helps show where Thomas L. Mote may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Thomas L. Mote
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Thomas L. Mote. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Thomas L. Mote based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Thomas L. Mote. Thomas L. Mote is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 3 | |
| 2 | 26 | |
| 3 | 1 | |
| 4 | 94 | |
| 5 | 17 | |
| 6 | 9 | |
| 7 | 34 | |
| 8 | 54 | |
| 9 | 24 | |
| 10 | 90 | |
| 11 | 9 | |
| 12 | 19 | |
| 13 | 230 | |
| 14 | 5 | |
| 15 | Validation of Narccap climate products for forest resource applications in the southeast United States | 1 |
| 16 | 4 | |
| 17 | 139 | |
| 18 | Evaluation of new snow depth and mass data sets for North America | 1 |
| 19 | 90 | |
| 20 | 63 |
About Thomas L. Mote
Thomas L. Mote is a scholar working on Atmospheric Science, Global and Planetary Change and Environmental Engineering, having authored 135 papers that have together received 5.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Climate variability and models (77 papers), Cryospheric studies and observations (68 papers) and Meteorological Phenomena and Simulations (60 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Atmospheric Science (4.5k citations), Global and Planetary Change (3.2k citations) and Environmental Engineering (719 citations). Thomas L. Mote has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Belgium and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Paul Dixon, J. Marshall Shepherd, Xavier Fettweis, Vittorio A. Gensini, Jamie Dyer, Andrew Grundstein, Marco Tedesco, Joshua D. Durkee, Mark R. Anderson and Kyle S. Mattingly. Their work appears in journals such as Nature Communications, SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología and Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.