Thomas L. Lincoln
- Co-authors
- Robert J. LukesClive R. TaylorP K PattengaleBarbara H. TindleRalph A. KorpmanGeorge H. WeissR. D. ParkerBranislav D. Janković
- Topics
- Electronic Health Records Systems (7 papers)Biomedical Text Mining and Ontologies (5 papers)Semantic Web and Ontologies (5 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesSerbia
In The Last Decade
Thomas L. Lincoln
37 papers receiving 433 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 111
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine 220
- Oncology 119
- Genetics 111
- Immunology 84
- Molecular Biology 73
Countries citing papers authored by Thomas L. Lincoln
This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas L. Lincoln's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas L. Lincoln with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas L. Lincoln more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas L. Lincoln
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas L. Lincoln. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas L. Lincoln. The network helps show where Thomas L. Lincoln may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Thomas L. Lincoln
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Thomas L. Lincoln. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Thomas L. Lincoln based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Thomas L. Lincoln. Thomas L. Lincoln is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 7 | |
| 2 | Codifying medical records in XML: philosophy and engineering | 1 |
| 3 | 3 | |
| 4 | 26 | |
| 5 | 9 | |
| 6 | 2 | |
| 7 | Laboratory medicine in the age of information. | 1 |
| 8 | 11 | |
| 9 | 1 | |
| 10 | The breast cancer networks : organizing to improve management of a disease | 5 |
| 11 | 32 | |
| 12 | 42 | |
| 13 | Contracting for a laboratory computer system. | 3 |
| 14 | 29 | |
| 15 | Pharmacokinetics of high-dose methotrexate with citrovorum factor rescue. | 49 |
| 16 | 4 | |
| 17 | 1 | |
| 18 | Medical Diagnosis Using Bayes Theorem | 22 |
| 19 | 2 | |
| 20 | 13 |
About Thomas L. Lincoln
Thomas L. Lincoln is a scholar working on Health Information Management, Family Practice and Management Information Systems, having authored 39 papers that have together received 544 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Electronic Health Records Systems (7 papers), Biomedical Text Mining and Ontologies (5 papers) and Semantic Web and Ontologies (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Pathology and Forensic Medicine (220 citations), Health Information Management (54 citations) and Genetics (111 citations). Thomas L. Lincoln has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Serbia. Frequent co-authors include Robert J. Lukes, Clive R. Taylor, P K Pattengale, Barbara H. Tindle, Ralph A. Korpman, George H. Weiss, R. D. Parker, Branislav D. Janković, Daniel Essin and Jerry Aroesty. Their work appears in journals such as Science, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences and JAMA.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.