Thomas L. Dawson
- Epidemiology top 1%
- Molecular Biology top 5%
- Dermatology top 0.2%
- Cell Biology top 1%
- Immunology top 5%
- Co-authors
- H. Shelton EarpJohn J. LemastersGregory J. GoresTeun BoekhoutA. L. NieminenByung In RoB. HermanAditya K. Gupta
- Topics
- Nail Diseases and Treatments (29 papers)Plant Pathogens and Fungal Diseases (16 papers)Fungal Infections and Studies (12 papers)
- Cited by
- DermatologyEpidemiologyCell Biology
- Journals
- Proceedings of the National Academy of SciencesJournal of Biological ChemistryNature Communications
- Partner nations
- United StatesSingaporeNetherlands
In The Last Decade
Thomas L. Dawson
75 papers receiving 5.0k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 155
- Epidemiology 1.9k
- Molecular Biology 1.4k
- Dermatology 1.3k
- Cell Biology 824
- Immunology 681
Countries citing papers authored by Thomas L. Dawson
This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas L. Dawson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas L. Dawson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas L. Dawson more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas L. Dawson
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas L. Dawson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas L. Dawson. The network helps show where Thomas L. Dawson may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Thomas L. Dawson
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Thomas L. Dawson. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Thomas L. Dawson based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Thomas L. Dawson. Thomas L. Dawson is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 3 | |
| 3 | 3 | |
| 4 | 1 | |
| 5 | 13 | |
| 6 | 11 | |
| 7 | 28 | |
| 8 | 27 | |
| 9 | 6 | |
| 10 | 12 | |
| 11 | 27 | |
| 12 | 84 | |
| 13 | 189 | |
| 14 | Testosterone eye drops: A novel treatment for dry eye disease | 4 |
| 15 | 204 | |
| 16 | 343 | |
| 17 | 33 | |
| 18 | 312 | |
| 19 | 24 | |
| 20 | The good huswifes jewell | 3 |
About Thomas L. Dawson
Thomas L. Dawson is a scholar working on Dermatology, Urology and Cell Biology, having authored 80 papers that have together received 5.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Nail Diseases and Treatments (29 papers), Plant Pathogens and Fungal Diseases (16 papers) and Fungal Infections and Studies (12 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Dermatology (1.3k citations), Epidemiology (1.9k citations) and Cell Biology (824 citations). Thomas L. Dawson has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Singapore and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include H. Shelton Earp, John J. Lemasters, Gregory J. Gores, Teun Boekhout, A. L. Nieminen, Byung In Ro, B. Herman, Aditya K. Gupta, Roma Batra and Hong Yu. Their work appears in journals such as Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Journal of Biological Chemistry and Nature Communications.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.