Thomas L. Austin

522 total citations
18 papers, 407 citations indexed

About

Thomas L. Austin is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Political Science and International Relations and Clinical Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Thomas L. Austin has authored 18 papers receiving a total of 407 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 11 papers in Sociology and Political Science, 7 papers in Political Science and International Relations and 5 papers in Clinical Psychology. Recurrent topics in Thomas L. Austin's work include Crime Patterns and Interventions (9 papers), Policing Practices and Perceptions (6 papers) and Sexual Assault and Victimization Studies (4 papers). Thomas L. Austin is often cited by papers focused on Crime Patterns and Interventions (9 papers), Policing Practices and Perceptions (6 papers) and Sexual Assault and Victimization Studies (4 papers). Thomas L. Austin collaborates with scholars based in United States. Thomas L. Austin's co-authors include Eve S. Buzawa, Don Hummer, Carl G. Buzawa, Matthew D. Fetzer, J. J. O’Neill, Michael E. Dunham, Donna C. Hale and John Ortiz Smykla and has published in prestigious journals such as American Behavioral Scientist, Criminal Justice and Behavior and Journal of Criminal Justice.

In The Last Decade

Thomas L. Austin

18 papers receiving 332 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Thomas L. Austin United States	10	288	197	139	95	81	18	407
Helen Eigenberg United States	16	458 1.6×	233 1.2×	267 1.9×	39 0.4×	143 1.8×	23	572
Pamela Tontodonato United States	7	228 0.8×	123 0.6×	94 0.7×	40 0.4×	103 1.3×	11	347
Hillary Potter United States	8	419 1.5×	186 0.9×	133 1.0×	86 0.9×	107 1.3×	14	511
John van Kesteren Netherlands	10	382 1.3×	137 0.7×	40 0.3×	66 0.7×	141 1.7×	14	487
Eva Schlesinger Buzawa United States	4	287 1.0×	262 1.3×	105 0.8×	89 0.9×	85 1.0×	7	383
Albert P. Cardarelli United States	8	311 1.1×	230 1.2×	81 0.6×	116 1.2×	255 3.1×	11	588
Kimberly J. Cook United States	11	304 1.1×	157 0.8×	99 0.7×	43 0.5×	132 1.6×	25	420
David Hirschel United States	13	398 1.4×	407 2.1×	191 1.4×	44 0.5×	78 1.0×	25	512
Gregg Lee Carter United States	9	275 1.0×	204 1.0×	25 0.2×	66 0.7×	122 1.5×	16	380
Michèle Burman United Kingdom	12	257 0.9×	116 0.6×	129 0.9×	47 0.5×	118 1.5×	31	378

Countries citing papers authored by Thomas L. Austin

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas L. Austin's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas L. Austin with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas L. Austin more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas L. Austin

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas L. Austin. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas L. Austin. The network helps show where Thomas L. Austin may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Thomas L. Austin

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Thomas L. Austin. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Thomas L. Austin based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Thomas L. Austin. Thomas L. Austin is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

18 of 18 papers shown

Fetzer, Matthew D., et al.. (2010). Policy Implications of the Effects of Maltreatment Type, Age, Recurrence, Severity, and Other Ecological Risks on Persistent Offending Among Disadvantaged Boys. Criminal Justice Policy Review. 22(2). 187–218. 3 indexed citations

Fetzer, Matthew D., et al.. (2010). An Examination of Direct and Indirect Effects of Maltreatment Dimensions and Other Ecological Risks on Persistent Youth Offending. Criminal Justice Review. 35(2). 220–243. 25 indexed citations

Austin, Thomas L., et al.. (2005). The Effect of Legal and Extralegal Factors on Statutory Exclusion of Juvenile Offenders. Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice. 3(3). 214–234. 16 indexed citations

Austin, Thomas L. & Don Hummer. (2000). What Do College Students Think of Policewomen?. Women & Criminal Justice. 10(4). 1–24. 25 indexed citations

Hale, Donna C., et al.. (1999). Present and Presenting: An Exploratory Analysis of Panel Attendance and Participation at the 1997 Annual Meeting of the Academy of Criminal Justice Sciences (ACJS). Criminal Justice Review. 24(1). 27–49. 5 indexed citations

Hummer, Don, et al.. (1998). Arming the campus cops: a descriptive and multivariate assessment of support. Policing An International Journal. 21(2). 255–268. 7 indexed citations

Buzawa, Eve S., Thomas L. Austin, & Carl G. Buzawa. (1995). Responding to Crimes of Violence Against Women: Gender Differences Versus Organizational Imperatives. Crime & Delinquency. 41(4). 443–466. 51 indexed citations

Austin, Thomas L. & Don Hummer. (1994). “Has a decade made a difference?” Attitudes of male criminal justice majors towards female police officers. Journal of Criminal Justice Education. 5(2). 229–239. 25 indexed citations

Buzawa, Eve S. & Thomas L. Austin. (1993). Determining Police Response to Domestic Violence Victims. American Behavioral Scientist. 36(5). 610–623. 139 indexed citations

10.

Dunham, Michael E. & Thomas L. Austin. (1990). Congenital aglossia and situs inversus. International Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology. 19(2). 163–168. 14 indexed citations

11.

Austin, Thomas L., et al.. (1988). Class scheduling and academic achievement in a non-traditional graduate program. Innovative Higher Education. 12(2). 79–90. 9 indexed citations

12.

Austin, Thomas L., et al.. (1987). The Effect of Layoff on Police Authoritarianism. Criminal Justice and Behavior. 14(2). 194–210. 10 indexed citations

13.

Austin, Thomas L. & J. J. O’Neill. (1985). Authoritarianism and the Criminal Justice Student: A Test of the Predispositional Model. Criminal Justice Review. 10(1). 33–40. 18 indexed citations

14.

Austin, Thomas L.. (1985). Does Where You Live Determine What You Get? A Case Study of Misdemeanant Sentencing. The Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology (1973-). 76(2). 490–490. 9 indexed citations

15.

Austin, Thomas L. & Eve S. Buzawa. (1984). Citizen perceptions on mass transit crime and its deterrence: a case study. Transportation quarterly. 38(1). 8 indexed citations

16.

Austin, Thomas L.. (1981). The influence of court location on type of criminal sentence: The rural-urban factor. Journal of Criminal Justice. 9(4). 305–316. 37 indexed citations

17.

Austin, Thomas L.. (1981). Criminal Sentencing in Urban, Suburban, and Rural Counties. Criminal Justice Review. 6(2). 31–37. 4 indexed citations

18.

Austin, Thomas L., et al.. (1970). The Refugee: A Problem of Definition. Case Western Reserve journal of international law. 3(1). 45. 2 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact