Thomas Kloss

1.1k citations
35 papers · 740 · h-index 16

Impact in

Papers in

Thomas Kloss

33 papers receiving 733 citations

Peers

Thomas Kloss
Comparison fields: 5 of 73
  • Computational Mathematics 17
  • Condensed Matter Physics 253
  • Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials 173
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 255
  • Mathematical Physics 54
Replace Daniel E. Parker with:
Daniel E. Parker United States
Rafael A. Molina Spain
Olav F. Syljuåsen Denmark
Wenan Guo China
H. J. F. Knops Netherlands
Ying-Jer Kao Taiwan
Prabodh Shukla India
Pierre Pujol France
Yang Qi China
G. Fano Italy
Thomas Kloss relative to Daniel E. Parker United States Daniel E. Parker's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×20×32×
Daniel E. Parker · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Thomas Kloss

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas Kloss's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas Kloss with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas Kloss more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas Kloss

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas Kloss. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas Kloss. The network helps show where Thomas Kloss may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Thomas Kloss, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Thomas Kloss Line = papers co-authored together Thomas Kloss links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 35 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2005148
2 200860
3 201251
4 202250
5 201449
6 200934
7 200734
8 201429
9 201629
10 202123
11 201821
12 201719
13 200918
14 201517
15 202515
16 201715
17 201213
18 201113
19 201412
20 200812

About Thomas Kloss

Thomas Kloss is a scholar working on Condensed Matter Physics, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Biomedical Engineering, Molecular Biology and Electrical and Electronic Engineering, having authored 35 papers that have together received 740 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Physics of Superconductivity and Magnetism (14 papers), Quantum and electron transport phenomena (11 papers), Advanced Condensed Matter Physics (5 papers), Theoretical and Computational Physics (4 papers), Ion channel regulation and function (4 papers), Superconducting Materials and Applications (4 papers), Quantum, superfluid, helium dynamics (3 papers) and Cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Computational Mathematics (17 citations), Condensed Matter Physics (253 citations), Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials (173 citations), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (255 citations) and Mathematical Physics (54 citations). Thomas Kloss has collaborated with scholars based in France, Germany and Brazil. Frequent co-authors include Stefan M. Kast, Léonie Canet, C. Pépin, X. Montiel, Nicolás Wschebor, Xavier Waintal, Kristin A. Schönau, Helmut Ehrenberg, Rüdiger‐A. Eichel and Peter Kopietz. Their work appears in journals such as Physical Review B, Physical review. B., Nature Communications, New Journal of Physics and European Biophysics Journal.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact