Thomas Kerwin

569 total citations
36 papers, 425 citations indexed

About

Thomas Kerwin is a scholar working on Surgery, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition and Social Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Thomas Kerwin has authored 36 papers receiving a total of 425 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 15 papers in Surgery, 12 papers in Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition and 9 papers in Social Psychology. Recurrent topics in Thomas Kerwin's work include Surgical Simulation and Training (14 papers), Augmented Reality Applications (7 papers) and Traffic and Road Safety (7 papers). Thomas Kerwin is often cited by papers focused on Surgical Simulation and Training (14 papers), Augmented Reality Applications (7 papers) and Traffic and Road Safety (7 papers). Thomas Kerwin collaborates with scholars based in United States, Canada and China. Thomas Kerwin's co-authors include Gregory J. Wiet, Don Stredney, Han‐Wei Shen, D. Bradley Welling, Brad J. Bushman, Janet M. Weisenberger, Kimerly Powell, Mahmoud Abdel‐Rasoul, Soledad Fernández and D Stredney and has published in prestigious journals such as Neurosurgery, Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation and Journal of Experimental Social Psychology.

In The Last Decade

Thomas Kerwin

33 papers receiving 421 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Thomas Kerwin United States 13 255 106 89 75 61 36 425
Anthony Del Signore United States 10 265 1.0× 167 1.6× 63 0.7× 73 1.0× 17 0.3× 34 526
Patorn Piromchai Thailand 15 473 1.9× 84 0.8× 55 0.6× 202 2.7× 64 1.0× 65 811
D Stredney United States 16 228 0.9× 163 1.5× 192 2.2× 53 0.7× 21 0.3× 34 523
Peter Trier Mikkelsen Denmark 11 208 0.8× 79 0.7× 81 0.9× 114 1.5× 22 0.4× 17 334
Niels H. Bakker Netherlands 11 143 0.6× 80 0.8× 86 1.0× 19 0.3× 15 0.2× 18 379
Khalid Bajunaid Saudi Arabia 16 366 1.4× 229 2.2× 75 0.8× 79 1.1× 26 0.4× 29 590
Kunal Shetty United States 11 273 1.1× 51 0.5× 18 0.2× 20 0.3× 13 0.2× 30 455
Nusrat Choudhury Canada 7 324 1.3× 315 3.0× 117 1.3× 42 0.6× 23 0.4× 14 531
D Sessanna United States 11 306 1.2× 170 1.6× 193 2.2× 53 0.7× 17 0.3× 20 422
Cecilie Våpenstad Norway 11 355 1.4× 253 2.4× 145 1.6× 70 0.9× 9 0.1× 21 495

Countries citing papers authored by Thomas Kerwin

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas Kerwin's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas Kerwin with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas Kerwin more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas Kerwin

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas Kerwin. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas Kerwin. The network helps show where Thomas Kerwin may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Thomas Kerwin

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Thomas Kerwin. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Thomas Kerwin based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Thomas Kerwin. Thomas Kerwin is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Kerwin, Thomas. (2025). Pydre: A Python package for driving simulation data reduction. The Journal of Open Source Software. 10(108). 7870–7870.
2.
Kerwin, Thomas, et al.. (2025). Mesopic and glare driving performance in a driving simulator. Traffic Injury Prevention. 26(6). 679–685.
3.
Yang, Jingzhen, et al.. (2024). Visual Function and Driving Performance Under Different Lighting Conditions in Older Drivers: Preliminary Results From an Observational Study. JMIR Formative Research. 8. e58465–e58465. 2 indexed citations
4.
Yang, Jingzhen, Despina Stavrinos, Thomas Kerwin, et al.. (2024). R2DRV: study protocol for longitudinal assessment of driving after mild TBI in young drivers. Injury Epidemiology. 11(1). 10–10.
5.
Kerwin, Thomas, et al.. (2023). Driving performance acutely after mTBI among young drivers. Accident Analysis & Prevention. 193. 107299–107299. 3 indexed citations
6.
Fogt, Jennifer Swingle, et al.. (2021). Driving performance and road sign identification by multifocal contact lens wearers in a driving simulator. Contact Lens and Anterior Eye. 45(4). 101493–101493. 5 indexed citations
7.
Kerwin, Thomas, et al.. (2017). Cross-Institutional Evaluation of a Mastoidectomy Assessment Instrument. Journal of surgical education. 75(3). 678–687. 3 indexed citations
8.
Kerwin, Thomas, et al.. (2017). Expert subjective comparison of haptic models for bone–drill interaction. International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery. 12(12). 2039–2045. 2 indexed citations
9.
Powell, Kimerly, et al.. (2017). Atlas-Based Segmentation of Temporal Bone Anatomy. International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery. 12(11). 1937–1944. 43 indexed citations
10.
Wiet, Gregory J., et al.. (2016). Integration of high-resolution data for temporal bone surgical simulations. International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery. 11(10). 1845–1854. 5 indexed citations
11.
Stredney, Don, Ali R. Rezai, Daniel M. Prevedello, et al.. (2013). Translating the Simulation of Procedural Drilling Techniques for Interactive Neurosurgical Training. Neurosurgery. 73(supplement 1). S74–S80. 21 indexed citations
12.
Wiet, Gregory J., et al.. (2012). Translating surgical metrics into automated assessments.. Europe PMC (PubMed Central). 6 indexed citations
13.
Kerwin, Thomas, Don Stredney, Gregory J. Wiet, & Han‐Wei Shen. (2012). Virtual mastoidectomy performance evaluation through multi-volume analysis. International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery. 8(1). 51–61. 8 indexed citations
14.
Wiet, Gregory J., Don Stredney, Thomas Kerwin, et al.. (2011). Virtual temporal bone dissection system: OSU virtual temporal bone system. The Laryngoscope. 122(S1). S1–12. 80 indexed citations
15.
Kerwin, Thomas, Gregory J. Wiet, Don Stredney, & Han‐Wei Shen. (2011). Automatic scoring of virtual mastoidectomies using expert examples. International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery. 7(1). 1–11. 33 indexed citations
16.
Wan, Dinah, Gregory J. Wiet, D. Bradley Welling, Thomas Kerwin, & Don Stredney. (2010). Creating a cross‐institutional grading scale for temporal bone dissection. The Laryngoscope. 120(7). 1422–1427. 30 indexed citations
17.
Kerwin, Thomas, Han‐Wei Shen, & D Stredney. (2009). Enhancing Realism of Wet Surfaces in Temporal Bone Surgical Simulation. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics. 15(5). 747–758. 26 indexed citations
18.
Kerwin, Thomas, Han‐Wei Shen, & Don Stredney. (2006). Capture and Review of Interactive Volumetric Manipulations for Surgical Training. Eurographics. 71–74. 1 indexed citations
19.
Stredney, D, et al.. (2003). Facilitating Real-time Volume Interaction. Studies in health technology and informatics. 94. 329–35. 2 indexed citations
20.
Poling, Gayla L., Janet M. Weisenberger, & Thomas Kerwin. (2003). The role of multisensory feedback in haptic surface perception. 15. 187–194. 15 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026