Thomas Kerwin

33 papers receiving 421 citations

Peers

Thomas Kerwin
Comparison fields: 5 of 79
  • Otorhinolaryngology 55
  • Surgery 255
  • Human-Computer Interaction 31
  • Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 89
  • Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design 10
Replace D Sessanna with:
D Sessanna United States
Peter Trier Mikkelsen Denmark
D Stredney United States
Anthony Del Signore United States
Matt Griffiths United Kingdom
Niels H. Bakker Netherlands
Jordan Hochman Canada
Aaron Oliker United States
Kunal Shetty United States
Nusrat Choudhury Canada
Thomas Kerwin relative to D Sessanna United States D Sessanna's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×
D Sessanna · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Thomas Kerwin

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas Kerwin's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas Kerwin with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas Kerwin more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas Kerwin

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas Kerwin. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas Kerwin. The network helps show where Thomas Kerwin may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Thomas Kerwin, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Thomas Kerwin Line = papers co-authored together Thomas Kerwin links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 36 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201180
2 201743
3 201133
4 201030
5 201929
6 200926
7 201321
8 201621
9 201720
10 202015
11 200315
12 201915
13 201714
14 20128
15
Translating surgical metrics into automated assessments.
20126
16 20106
17 20165
18 20215
19 20175
20 20194

About Thomas Kerwin

Thomas Kerwin is a scholar working on Surgery, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Social Psychology, Biomedical Engineering and Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality, having authored 36 papers that have together received 425 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Surgical Simulation and Training (14 papers), Traffic and Road Safety (7 papers), Augmented Reality Applications (7 papers), Anatomy and Medical Technology (6 papers), Human-Automation Interaction and Safety (5 papers), Older Adults Driving Studies (5 papers), Computer Graphics and Visualization Techniques (4 papers) and Crime Patterns and Interventions (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Otorhinolaryngology (55 citations), Surgery (255 citations), Human-Computer Interaction (31 citations), Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (89 citations) and Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design (10 citations). Thomas Kerwin has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and China. Frequent co-authors include Gregory J. Wiet, Don Stredney, Han‐Wei Shen, D. Bradley Welling, Brad J. Bushman, Janet M. Weisenberger, Soledad Fernández, Mahmoud Abdel‐Rasoul, Kimerly Powell and D Stredney. Their work appears in journals such as International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery, Journal of surgical education, Neurosurgery, Accident Analysis & Prevention and The Laryngoscope.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact