Thomas J. Graetz

8 papers receiving 132 citations

Peers

Thomas J. Graetz
Comparison fields: 5 of 56
  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine 15
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 40
  • Emergency Medicine 16
  • Internal Medicine 5
  • Surgery 50
Replace Brenda Iglesias with:
Brenda Iglesias United States
Hilde M. Norum Norway
M. Jonas United Kingdom
Shaun M. May United Kingdom
Patrick Moore United Kingdom
Anthony J. Rousou United States
Francesca Rapido France
Gert-Jan Scheffer Netherlands
Eva Ganovská Czechia
Jenifer Sanchez United Kingdom
Thomas J. Graetz relative to Brenda Iglesias United States Brenda Iglesias's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.2×
Brenda Iglesias · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Thomas J. Graetz

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas J. Graetz's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas J. Graetz with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas J. Graetz more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas J. Graetz

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas J. Graetz. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas J. Graetz. The network helps show where Thomas J. Graetz may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Thomas J. Graetz, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Thomas J. Graetz Line = papers co-authored together Thomas J. Graetz links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

8 of 8 papers shown
#Work
1 202053
2 201623
3 201120
4 201415
5 202010
6 201810
7 20173
8 20112

About Thomas J. Graetz

Thomas J. Graetz is a scholar working on Surgery, Biomedical Engineering, Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, having authored 8 papers that have together received 136 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices (3 papers), Respiratory Support and Mechanisms (2 papers), Intensive Care Unit Cognitive Disorders (2 papers), Cardiac Structural Anomalies and Repair (2 papers), Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment (2 papers), Heart Failure Treatment and Management (1 paper), Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes (1 paper) and Central Venous Catheters and Hemodialysis (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine (15 citations), Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (40 citations), Emergency Medicine (16 citations), Internal Medicine (5 citations) and Surgery (50 citations). Thomas J. Graetz has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Michael S. Avidan, Daniel A. Emmert, Robert Bowen, Richard S. Hotchkiss, Bethany R Tellor Pennington, Jennifer R. Smith, Robert Gregory, Kevin Cullison, Nicholas M. Mohr and Brian M. Fuller. Their work appears in journals such as Nature Reviews Nephrology, BMJ Open, Journal of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia, Expert Review of Cardiovascular Therapy and ASAIO Journal.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact