Thomas J. Flatley

407 total citations
10 papers, 294 citations indexed

About

Thomas J. Flatley is a scholar working on Surgery, Pathology and Forensic Medicine and Epidemiology. According to data from OpenAlex, Thomas J. Flatley has authored 10 papers receiving a total of 294 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 9 papers in Surgery, 7 papers in Pathology and Forensic Medicine and 2 papers in Epidemiology. Recurrent topics in Thomas J. Flatley's work include Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology (7 papers), Spinal Fractures and Fixation Techniques (5 papers) and Scoliosis diagnosis and treatment (4 papers). Thomas J. Flatley is often cited by papers focused on Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology (7 papers), Spinal Fractures and Fixation Techniques (5 papers) and Scoliosis diagnosis and treatment (4 papers). Thomas J. Flatley collaborates with scholars based in United States. Thomas J. Flatley's co-authors include Guillermo F. Carrera, A T Isitman, B. David Collier, Glenn A. Meyer, Jacek Zielonka, R S Hellman, Robert S. Hellman, Nicholas J. Meyer, Sanford J. Larson and Dennis J. Maiman and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Radiology and Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research.

In The Last Decade

Thomas J. Flatley

9 papers receiving 283 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Thomas J. Flatley United States	6	240	173	92	52	22	10	294
Lytton Williams United States	9	363 1.5×	296 1.7×	91 1.0×	46 0.9×	7 0.3×	11	413
William A. Liebler United States	9	237 1.0×	175 1.0×	106 1.2×	54 1.0×	22 1.0×	13	309
Yinggang Zheng United States	8	382 1.6×	313 1.8×	75 0.8×	88 1.7×	11 0.5×	14	454
Shuwan Yu United States	8	192 0.8×	260 1.5×	137 1.5×	107 2.1×	29 1.3×	15	318
Carl V. Bundschuh United States	7	228 0.9×	198 1.1×	27 0.3×	53 1.0×	34 1.5×	9	303
L. E. Laurent Finland	10	305 1.3×	232 1.3×	165 1.8×	26 0.5×	4 0.2×	19	363
Xiangyao Sun China	13	328 1.4×	298 1.7×	82 0.9×	29 0.6×	9 0.4×	32	375
Stavros Oikonomidis Germany	11	287 1.2×	225 1.3×	69 0.8×	59 1.1×	7 0.3×	33	342
Armando Alpízar-Aguirre Mexico	9	207 0.9×	207 1.2×	114 1.2×	32 0.6×	5 0.2×	53	287
Felix F. Ungacta United States	8	510 2.1×	427 2.5×	70 0.8×	45 0.9×	16 0.7×	8	564

Countries citing papers authored by Thomas J. Flatley

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas J. Flatley's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas J. Flatley with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas J. Flatley more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas J. Flatley

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas J. Flatley. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas J. Flatley. The network helps show where Thomas J. Flatley may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Thomas J. Flatley

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Thomas J. Flatley. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Thomas J. Flatley based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Thomas J. Flatley. Thomas J. Flatley is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

10 of 10 papers shown

1.

Meyer, Nicholas J., et al.. (2003). Superiorly Based Laminoplasty in Children. Journal of Spinal Disorders & Techniques. 16(2). 156–162. 20 indexed citations

2.

Simons, George W., et al.. (1988). Intra-articular osteocartilaginous obstruction to reduction of congenital dislocation of the hip. Report of three cases.. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. 70(5). 760–768. 2 indexed citations

3.

Collier, B. David, et al.. (1987). Painful pseudarthrosis following lumbar spinal fusion: detection by combined SPECT and planar bone scintigraphy. Skeletal Radiology. 16(2). 136–141. 43 indexed citations

4.

Flatley, Thomas J., et al.. (1987). Postoperative Spondylolisthesis. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research. 221(221). 172–180. 25 indexed citations

5.

Collier, B. David, Guillermo F. Carrera, Glenn A. Meyer, et al.. (1985). Painful spondylolysis or spondylolisthesis studied by radiography and single-photon emission computed tomography.. Radiology. 154(1). 207–211. 112 indexed citations

6.

Flatley, Thomas J., et al.. (1985). Closed Loop Instrumentation of the Lumbar Spine. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research. 196(196). 273–278. 72 indexed citations

7.

Maiman, Dennis J., Anthony Sances, Sanford J. Larson, et al.. (1985). Comparison of the Failure Biomechanics of Spinal Fixation Devices. Neurosurgery. 17(4). 574–580. 4 indexed citations

8.

Flatley, Thomas J., et al.. (1984). Spinal instability due to malignant disease. Treatment by segmental spinal stabilization.. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. 66(1). 47–52. 13 indexed citations

9.

Flatley, Thomas J.. (1982). Segmental Spinal Instrumentation. PubMed. 5(4). 50–50.

10.

Flatley, Thomas J., et al.. (1975). Lumbar Fusion Using Facet Inlay Grafts. Southern Medical Journal. 68(2). 209–216. 3 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact