Thomas Helbling

1.4k citations
35 papers · 1.1k · h-index 17

Impact in

Papers in

Thomas Helbling

35 papers receiving 1.1k citations

Peers

Thomas Helbling
Comparison fields: 5 of 68
  • Bioengineering 101
  • Materials Chemistry 762
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 402
  • Electrical and Electronic Engineering 583
  • Biomedical Engineering 415
Replace Johnson Kasim with:
Johnson Kasim Singapore
Ahmed Samir Egypt
A. Jungen Switzerland
Nicolas Reckinger Belgium
Forest Shih-Sen Chien Taiwan
Dirk Obergfell Germany
Shishir Kumar Ireland
Oscar Vázquez-Mena United States
Ashkan Behnam United States
Soo Ho Choi South Korea
Thomas Helbling relative to Johnson Kasim Singapore Johnson Kasim's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.8×
Johnson Kasim · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Thomas Helbling

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas Helbling's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas Helbling with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas Helbling more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas Helbling

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas Helbling. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas Helbling. The network helps show where Thomas Helbling may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Thomas Helbling, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Thomas Helbling Line = papers co-authored together Thomas Helbling links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 35 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2007212
2 2006172
3 201093
4 200784
5 200760
6 200955
7 201049
8 200946
9 201137
10 200934
11 201032
12 200829
13 200927
14 200625
15 200719
16 200917
17 200716
18 200915
19 201012
20 20059

About Thomas Helbling

Thomas Helbling is a scholar working on Materials Chemistry, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Biomedical Engineering and Automotive Engineering, having authored 35 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Carbon Nanotubes in Composites (31 papers), Mechanical and Optical Resonators (20 papers), Force Microscopy Techniques and Applications (7 papers), Advanced MEMS and NEMS Technologies (6 papers), Gas Sensing Nanomaterials and Sensors (6 papers), Graphene research and applications (6 papers), Nanowire Synthesis and Applications (4 papers) and Nanotechnology research and applications (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Bioengineering (101 citations), Materials Chemistry (762 citations), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (402 citations), Electrical and Electronic Engineering (583 citations) and Biomedical Engineering (415 citations). Thomas Helbling has collaborated with scholars based in Switzerland, Germany and United States. Frequent co-authors include Christofer Hierold, Christoph Stampfer, A. Jungen, Lukas Durrer, Cosmin Roman, Matthias Muoth, Victor M. Bright, R. Pohle, Marie Tripp and Cari F. Herrmann‐Abell. Their work appears in journals such as Nanotechnology, physica status solidi (b), Sensors and Actuators B Chemical, Nano Letters and Sensors and Actuators A Physical.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact