Thomas H. Porter
- Molecular Biology
- Organic Chemistry top 10%
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
- Toxicology top 2%
- Animal Science and Zoology top 10%
- Co-authors
- Karl FolkersYoshifumi IwamotoChristine M. BowmanH. Darmani KuhiSecundino LópezE. KebreabTom J. MabryJ. France
- Topics
- Coenzyme Q10 studies and effects (17 papers)Organic Chemistry Cycloaddition Reactions (11 papers)Bioactive Compounds and Antitumor Agents (8 papers)
- Journals
- Proceedings of the National Academy of SciencesBiochemical and Biophysical Research CommunicationsJournal of Medicinal Chemistry
- Partner nations
- United StatesAustraliaIran
In The Last Decade
Thomas H. Porter
38 papers receiving 683 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 102
- Molecular Biology 313
- Organic Chemistry 183
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 112
- Toxicology 105
- Animal Science and Zoology 76
Countries citing papers authored by Thomas H. Porter
This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas H. Porter's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas H. Porter with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas H. Porter more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas H. Porter
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas H. Porter. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas H. Porter. The network helps show where Thomas H. Porter may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Thomas H. Porter
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Thomas H. Porter. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Thomas H. Porter based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Thomas H. Porter. Thomas H. Porter is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | |
| 2 | 41 | |
| 3 | 60 | |
| 4 | 32 | |
| 5 | 10 | |
| 6 | 5 | |
| 7 | 69 | |
| 8 | 3 | |
| 9 | 5 | |
| 10 | 5 | |
| 11 | The Fetus as Personality | 3 |
| 12 | 8 | |
| 13 | 15 | |
| 14 | Antimetabolites of coenzyme Q. XV. Inhibition of mitochondrial reductase systems by naphthoquinone and quinolinequinone analogs. | 4 |
| 15 | 4 | |
| 16 | 9 | |
| 17 | 15 | |
| 18 | 17 | |
| 19 | 12 | |
| 20 | 1 |
About Thomas H. Porter
Thomas H. Porter is a scholar working on Toxicology, Organic Chemistry and Biochemistry, having authored 38 papers that have together received 737 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Coenzyme Q10 studies and effects (17 papers), Organic Chemistry Cycloaddition Reactions (11 papers) and Bioactive Compounds and Antitumor Agents (8 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Toxicology (105 citations), Biophysics (46 citations) and Animal Science and Zoology (76 citations). Thomas H. Porter has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Australia and Iran. Frequent co-authors include Karl Folkers, Yoshifumi Iwamoto, Christine M. Bowman, H. Darmani Kuhi, Secundino López, E. Kebreab, Tom J. Mabry, J. France, Anja Varmløse Strathe and William Shive. Their work appears in journals such as Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications and Journal of Medicinal Chemistry.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.