Thomas Guillerme
- Ecology top 5%
- Paleontology top 2%
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics top 5%
- Nature and Landscape Conservation top 5%
- Global and Planetary Change top 10%
- Co-authors
- Natalie CooperKevin HealyPedro CardosoStefano MammolaCarlos P. CarmonaAndrew L. JacksonS. KellyAdam Kane
- Topics
- Evolution and Paleontology Studies (14 papers)Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (9 papers)Morphological variations and asymmetry (6 papers)
- Journals
- The American NaturalistPhilosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological SciencesEvolution
- Partner nations
- United KingdomAustraliaIreland
In The Last Decade
Thomas Guillerme
25 papers receiving 1.1k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 92
- Ecology 454
- Paleontology 413
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 325
- Nature and Landscape Conservation 290
- Global and Planetary Change 175
Countries citing papers authored by Thomas Guillerme
This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas Guillerme's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas Guillerme with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas Guillerme more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas Guillerme
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas Guillerme. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas Guillerme. The network helps show where Thomas Guillerme may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Thomas Guillerme
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Thomas Guillerme. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Thomas Guillerme based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Thomas Guillerme. Thomas Guillerme is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | |
| 2 | 9 | |
| 3 | 3 | |
| 4 | 1 | |
| 5 | 7 | |
| 6 | 11 | |
| 7 | Concepts and applications in functional diversitybreakdown → | 186 |
| 8 | 37 | |
| 9 | 68 | |
| 10 | 28 | |
| 11 | 25 | |
| 12 | 15 | |
| 13 | 171 | |
| 14 | 37 | |
| 15 | 1 | |
| 16 | 84 | |
| 17 | 19 | |
| 18 | 62 | |
| 19 | 35 | |
| 20 | 212 |
About Thomas Guillerme
Thomas Guillerme is a scholar working on Paleontology, Ecological Modeling and Nature and Landscape Conservation, having authored 25 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Evolution and Paleontology Studies (14 papers), Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (9 papers) and Morphological variations and asymmetry (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Paleontology (413 citations), Ecological Modeling (123 citations) and Nature and Landscape Conservation (290 citations). Thomas Guillerme has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Australia and Ireland. Frequent co-authors include Natalie Cooper, Kevin Healy, Pedro Cardoso, Stefano Mammola, Carlos P. Carmona, Andrew L. Jackson, S. Kelly, Adam Kane, Vera Weisbecker and Mark N. Puttick. Their work appears in journals such as The American Naturalist, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences and Evolution.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.