Thomas Gläser

5.0k citations
89 papers · 3.9k indexed · h-index 33

Thomas Gläser

88 papers receiving 3.7k citations

Peers

Thomas Gläser
Comparison fields: 5 of 153
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 1.5k
  • Behavioral Neuroscience 155
  • Biological Psychiatry 91
  • Molecular Biology 2.3k
  • Developmental Neuroscience 72
Replace Kazuyuki Yamada with:
Kazuyuki Yamada Japan
Ling Pan China
Stephen J. Lewis United States
Naı̈ma Hanoun France
Harald Höger Austria
Abba J. Kastin United States
T Furukawa Japan
Ted B. Usdin United States
Carlo Colantuoni United States
Michael M. Scott United States
Thomas Gläser relative to Kazuyuki Yamada Japan Kazuyuki Yamada's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.1×
Kazuyuki Yamada · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Thomas Gläser

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas Gläser's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas Gläser with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas Gläser more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas Gläser

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas Gläser. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas Gläser. The network helps show where Thomas Gläser may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Thomas Gläser, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Thomas Gläser Line = papers co-authored together Thomas Gläser links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20215
2 201922
3 20199
4 201847
5 20177
6 201615
7 201315
8
Soziale Lage älterer Menschen in Österreich
20120
9 201231
10
Math5 Confers Multipotency to Fate-Restricted Post-Mitotic Retinal Precursors
20092
11 200835
12
Math5 establishes retinal ganglion cell competence in postmitotic progenitor cells
20043
13 20037
14 19984
15 19987
16 199330
17 199277
18 19904
19 19903
20 198817

About Thomas Gläser

Thomas Gläser is a scholar working on Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Molecular Biology and Psychiatry and Mental health, having authored 89 papers that have together received 3.9k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Receptor Mechanisms and Signaling (21 papers), Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior (19 papers), Neuropeptides and Animal Physiology (15 papers), Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (11 papers), Neuroendocrine regulation and behavior (7 papers), Pharmacological Receptor Mechanisms and Effects (6 papers), Schizophrenia research and treatment (6 papers) and Multiple Sclerosis Research Studies (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (1.5k citations), Behavioral Neuroscience (155 citations) and Biological Psychiatry (91 citations). Thomas Gläser has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, United States and Bulgaria. Frequent co-authors include J. Traber, Jonathan A. Epstein, Richard L. Maas, Lisa I. Jepeal, Jian-Liang Cai, Bernd Hamprecht, David S. Walton, Jiaxin Cai, Joachim M. Greuel and Jean De Vry. Their work appears in journals such as European Journal of Pharmacology, Naunyn-Schmiedeberg s Archives of Pharmacology, BMC Neurology, Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science and Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026