Thomas Gallagher
- Artificial Intelligence top 10%
- Health Information Management top 2%
- General Health Professions
- Molecular Biology
- Health Informatics top 5%
- Co-authors
- Kudakwashe DubeScott McLachlanJason WalonoskiJoseph C. NicholsDylan HallAndre QuinaM KrámerOwen Johnson
- Topics
- Electronic Health Records Systems (5 papers)Ethics in Clinical Research (2 papers)Patient Dignity and Privacy (2 papers)
- Journals
- Journal of the American Medical Informatics AssociationHuman Gene TherapyThe Annals of Family Medicine
- Partner nations
- United StatesNew ZealandUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Thomas Gallagher
12 papers receiving 311 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 73
- Artificial Intelligence 170
- Health Information Management 82
- General Health Professions 47
- Molecular Biology 39
- Health Informatics 34
Countries citing papers authored by Thomas Gallagher
This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas Gallagher's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas Gallagher with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas Gallagher more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas Gallagher
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas Gallagher. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas Gallagher. The network helps show where Thomas Gallagher may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Thomas Gallagher
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Thomas Gallagher. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Thomas Gallagher based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Thomas Gallagher. Thomas Gallagher is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 28 | |
| 3 | 2 | |
| 4 | 4 | |
| 5 | 38 | |
| 6 | 5 | |
| 7 | Health Systems Turn to Communication and Resolution Programs to Identify Errors. | 1 |
| 8 | 213 | |
| 9 | 1 | |
| 10 | 28 | |
| 11 | 0 | |
| 12 | 1 | |
| 13 | 1 | |
| 14 | Auditing performance in government: Concepts and cases | 9 |
About Thomas Gallagher
Thomas Gallagher is a scholar working on Health Information Management, General Health Professions and Radiological and Ultrasound Technology, having authored 14 papers that have together received 332 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Electronic Health Records Systems (5 papers), Ethics in Clinical Research (2 papers) and Patient Dignity and Privacy (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Health Informatics (34 citations), Health Information Management (82 citations) and Artificial Intelligence (170 citations). Thomas Gallagher has collaborated with scholars based in United States, New Zealand and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Kudakwashe Dube, Scott McLachlan, Jason Walonoski, Joseph C. Nichols, Dylan Hall, Andre Quina, M Krámer, Owen Johnson, Henry Potts and Norman Fenton. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, Human Gene Therapy and The Annals of Family Medicine.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.