Countries citing papers authored by Thomas Gale Moore
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas Gale Moore's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas Gale Moore with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas Gale Moore more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas Gale Moore
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas Gale Moore. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas Gale Moore. The network helps show where Thomas Gale Moore may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Thomas Gale Moore
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Thomas Gale Moore.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Thomas Gale Moore based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Thomas Gale Moore. Thomas Gale Moore is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Moore, Thomas Gale, Kim McKee, & Adriana Mihaela Soaita. (2015). The Pursuit of Homeownership and the Importance of Family Support. ENLIGHTEN (Jurnal Bimbingan dan Konseling Islam).2 indexed citations
Moore, Thomas Gale. (1965). Broadway Theatre Myths. The Tulane Drama Review. 10(1). 95–109.1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.