Thomas G. Chastain

941 citations
47 papers · 739 · h-index 15

Impact in

Papers in

Thomas G. Chastain

45 papers receiving 691 citations

Peers

Thomas G. Chastain
Comparison fields: 5 of 50
  • Agronomy and Crop Science 275
  • Environmental Chemistry 186
  • Biochemistry 126
  • Plant Science 525
  • Soil Science 95
Replace Stephen O. Guy with:
Stephen O. Guy United States
Aritz Royo‐Esnal Spain
James M. Krall United States
Joel Torra Spain
Karnes E. Neill United States
T. C. Ta Canada
Robert E. L. Naylor United Kingdom
D. C. Thill United States
P. M. A. Tigerstedt Finland
M. O. Humphreys United Kingdom
Thomas G. Chastain relative to Stephen O. Guy United States Stephen O. Guy's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.5×
Stephen O. Guy · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Thomas G. Chastain

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas G. Chastain's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas G. Chastain with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas G. Chastain more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas G. Chastain

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas G. Chastain. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas G. Chastain. The network helps show where Thomas G. Chastain may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Thomas G. Chastain, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Thomas G. Chastain Line = papers co-authored together Thomas G. Chastain links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 47 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 199585
2 201278
3 201266
4 201363
5 201352
6 201633
7 201431
8 199727
9 199825
10 200624
11 201923
12 201516
13 198916
14 199616
15 201115
16 201414
17 200113
18 201313
19 198812
20 201512

About Thomas G. Chastain

Thomas G. Chastain is a scholar working on Plant Science, Environmental Chemistry, Agronomy and Crop Science, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics and Soil Science, having authored 47 papers that have together received 739 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Turfgrass Adaptation and Management (26 papers), Plant and fungal interactions (12 papers), Crop Yield and Soil Fertility (10 papers), Agronomic Practices and Intercropping Systems (6 papers), Soybean genetics and cultivation (4 papers), Horticultural and Viticultural Research (4 papers), Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive Physiology (4 papers) and Lipid metabolism and biosynthesis (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Agronomy and Crop Science (275 citations), Environmental Chemistry (186 citations), Biochemistry (126 citations), Plant Science (525 citations) and Soil Science (95 citations). Thomas G. Chastain has collaborated with scholars based in United States, New Zealand and Kuwait. Frequent co-authors include Donald John Wysocki, William C. Young, William F. Schillinger, Russell S. Karow, Stephen O. Guy, J. G. Hampton, Birte Boelt, Don F. Grabe, M.P. Rolston and Kim Campbell. Their work appears in journals such as Agronomy Journal, Crop Science, Field Crops Research, Weed Technology and Phytopathology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact