Thomas Frank

4.9k citations
98 papers · 2.6k indexed · h-index 29

Impact in

Papers in

Thomas Frank

90 papers receiving 2.4k citations

Peers

Thomas Frank
Comparison fields: 5 of 105
  • Insect Science 812
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 526
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 772
  • Ecology 573
  • Computational Mechanics 354
Replace S. Raghu with:
S. Raghu Australia
Chunlong Liu China
Joris Van Acker Belgium
William M. Healy United States
Franck Richard France
Jean‐Claude Ruel Canada
Andrew Peace United Kingdom
Mark O. Kimberley New Zealand
Susanne Winter Germany
Thomas Frank relative to S. Raghu Australia S. Raghu's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
S. Raghu · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Thomas Frank

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas Frank's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas Frank with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas Frank more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas Frank

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas Frank. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas Frank. The network helps show where Thomas Frank may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Thomas Frank, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Thomas Frank Line = papers co-authored together Thomas Frank links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 98 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2006333
2 2008224
3 199890
4 199885
5 201285
6 200483
7 201083
8 201480
9 200868
10
Inhomogeneous MUSIG Model - a Population Balance Approach for Polydispersed Bubbly Flows
200564
11 200760
12 201259
13 201957
14 200552
15 200649
16
Ground dwelling spiders (Araneae) in sown weed strips and adjacent fields
199542
17 200340
18 201137
19 200335
20 200935

About Thomas Frank

Thomas Frank is a scholar working on Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Insect Science, Nature and Landscape Conservation, Ecology and Plant Science, having authored 98 papers that have together received 2.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (31 papers), Plant and animal studies (26 papers), Mollusks and Parasites Studies (14 papers), Insect-Plant Interactions and Control (10 papers), Fluid Dynamics and Mixing (9 papers), Insect and Pesticide Research (8 papers), Plant Parasitism and Resistance (8 papers) and Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics (8 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Insect Science (812 citations), Nature and Landscape Conservation (526 citations), Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (772 citations), Ecology (573 citations) and Computational Mechanics (354 citations). Thomas Frank has collaborated with scholars based in Austria, Switzerland and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Eckhard Krepper, Dirk Lucas, Johann G. Zaller, Gregory Maxwell, Peter G. Loutzenhiser, Paul Strachan, Heinrich Manz, Clemens Felsmann, Horst-Michael Prasser and Thomas Drapela. Their work appears in journals such as Agriculture Ecosystems & Environment, Nuclear Engineering and Design, Annals of Applied Biology, Journal of Applied Entomology and Basic and Applied Ecology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact