Thomas Fovet
- Clinical Psychology top 5%
- Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints 37
- Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending 24
- Psychiatry and Mental health top 5%
- Schizophrenia research and treatment 19
- Bipolar Disorder and Treatment 12
- Electroconvulsive Therapy Studies 9
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 10%
- Functional Brain Connectivity Studies 14
- General Health Professions top 10%
- Health, Medicine and Society 18
-
- Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis 15
- Co-authors
- Ali AmadPierre ThomasGuillaume VaïvaMathilde HornRenaud JardriFabien D’HondtMarielle WatheletPierre A. Geoffroy
- Journals
- SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología (2 papers)Scientific Reports (1 paper)Biological Psychiatry (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- FranceUnited KingdomGermany
In The Last Decade
Thomas Fovet
92 papers receiving 881 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 88
- Clinical Psychology 520
- Psychiatry and Mental health 208
- Cognitive Neuroscience 215
- General Health Professions 179
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 79
Countries citing papers authored by Thomas Fovet
This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas Fovet's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas Fovet with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas Fovet more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas Fovet
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas Fovet. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas Fovet. The network helps show where Thomas Fovet may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Thomas Fovet, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2025 | 0 | |
| 2 | 2025 | 0 | |
| 3 | 2024 | 1 | |
| 4 | 2024 | 1 | |
| 5 | 2023 | 2 | |
| 6 | 2023 | 2 | |
| 7 | 2022 | 5 | |
| 8 | 2022 | 8 | |
| 9 | 2021 | 22 | |
| 10 | 2021 | 30 | |
| 11 | 2021 | 6 | |
| 12 | 2021 | 7 | |
| 13 | 2020 | 8 | |
| 14 | 2020 | 40 | |
| 15 | 2020 | 7 | |
| 16 | 2020 | 22 | |
| 17 | 2019 | 6 | |
| 18 | 2018 | 17 | |
| 19 | 2018 | 16 | |
| 20 | 2018 | 13 |
About Thomas Fovet
Thomas Fovet is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Psychiatry and Mental health and Family Practice, having authored 107 papers that have together received 912 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints (37 papers), Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending (24 papers), Schizophrenia research and treatment (19 papers), Health, Medicine and Society (18 papers), Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis (15 papers), Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (14 papers), Bipolar Disorder and Treatment (12 papers) and Electroconvulsive Therapy Studies (9 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Clinical Psychology (520 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (208 citations) and Cognitive Neuroscience (215 citations). Thomas Fovet has collaborated with scholars based in France, United Kingdom and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Ali Amad, Pierre Thomas, Guillaume Vaïva, Mathilde Horn, Renaud Jardri, Fabien D’Hondt, Marielle Wathelet, Pierre A. Geoffroy, Jean‐Arthur Micoulaud‐Franchi and François Vialatte. Their work appears in journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Scientific Reports and Biological Psychiatry.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.