Thomas Fovet
- Clinical Psychology top 5%
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 10%
- Psychiatry and Mental health top 5%
- General Health Professions top 10%
- Sociology and Political Science top 10%
- Co-authors
- Ali AmadPierre ThomasGuillaume VaïvaMathilde HornRenaud JardriFabien D’HondtMarielle WatheletPierre A. Geoffroy
- Topics
- Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints (37 papers)Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending (24 papers)Schizophrenia research and treatment (19 papers)
- Journals
- SHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaScientific ReportsBiological Psychiatry
- Partner nations
- FranceUnited KingdomGermany
In The Last Decade
Thomas Fovet
92 papers receiving 881 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 88
- Clinical Psychology 520
- Cognitive Neuroscience 215
- Psychiatry and Mental health 208
- General Health Professions 179
- Sociology and Political Science 146
Countries citing papers authored by Thomas Fovet
This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas Fovet's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas Fovet with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas Fovet more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas Fovet
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas Fovet. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas Fovet. The network helps show where Thomas Fovet may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Thomas Fovet
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Thomas Fovet. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Thomas Fovet based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Thomas Fovet. Thomas Fovet is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 1 | |
| 4 | 1 | |
| 5 | 2 | |
| 6 | 2 | |
| 7 | 5 | |
| 8 | 8 | |
| 9 | 22 | |
| 10 | 30 | |
| 11 | 6 | |
| 12 | 7 | |
| 13 | 8 | |
| 14 | 40 | |
| 15 | 7 | |
| 16 | 22 | |
| 17 | 6 | |
| 18 | 17 | |
| 19 | 16 | |
| 20 | 13 |
About Thomas Fovet
Thomas Fovet is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Psychiatry and Mental health and Family Practice, having authored 107 papers that have together received 912 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints (37 papers), Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending (24 papers) and Schizophrenia research and treatment (19 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Clinical Psychology (520 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (208 citations) and Cognitive Neuroscience (215 citations). Thomas Fovet has collaborated with scholars based in France, United Kingdom and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Ali Amad, Pierre Thomas, Guillaume Vaïva, Mathilde Horn, Renaud Jardri, Fabien D’Hondt, Marielle Wathelet, Pierre A. Geoffroy, Jean‐Arthur Micoulaud‐Franchi and François Vialatte. Their work appears in journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Scientific Reports and Biological Psychiatry.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.