Thomas Feuring

1.9k citations
35 papers · 1.2k · h-index 14

Impact in

Papers in

Thomas Feuring

33 papers receiving 1.1k citations

Peers

Thomas Feuring
Comparison fields: 5 of 85
  • Statistics and Probability 794
  • Management Science and Operations Research 545
  • Modeling and Simulation 192
  • Applied Mathematics 272
  • Control and Systems Engineering 407
Replace Hsien-Chung Wu with:
Hsien-Chung Wu Taiwan
Kai Yao China
Yuhong Sheng China
Yuhan Liu China
Andrzej Piegat Poland
C. R. Bector Canada
Asad Ali Pakistan
Lifen Jia China
Nasreen Kausar Türkiye
Thomas Feuring relative to Hsien-Chung Wu Taiwan Hsien-Chung Wu's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.1×
Hsien-Chung Wu · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Thomas Feuring

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas Feuring's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas Feuring with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas Feuring more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas Feuring

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas Feuring. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas Feuring. The network helps show where Thomas Feuring may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 3 scholars most cited alongside Thomas Feuring, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Thomas Feuring Line = papers co-authored together Thomas Feuring links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 35 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2000327
2 2000177
3 2001169
4 1999140
5 200289
6 200187
7 200043
8 199924
9 200122
10 200220
11 199819
12
FUZZY NEURAL NETWORKS ARE UNIVERSAL APPROXIMATORS
199516
13 200015
14 199913
15 199913
16 199910
17 20028
18 20016
19 20025
20 20024

About Thomas Feuring

Thomas Feuring is a scholar working on Artificial Intelligence, Statistics and Probability, Management Science and Operations Research, Control and Systems Engineering and Computational Theory and Mathematics, having authored 35 papers that have together received 1.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Fuzzy Logic and Control Systems (23 papers), Fuzzy Systems and Optimization (23 papers), Neural Networks and Applications (15 papers), Multi-Criteria Decision Making (9 papers), Optimization and Mathematical Programming (5 papers), Rough Sets and Fuzzy Logic (4 papers), Optimization and Variational Analysis (2 papers) and Functional Equations Stability Results (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Statistics and Probability (794 citations), Management Science and Operations Research (545 citations), Modeling and Simulation (192 citations), Applied Mathematics (272 citations) and Control and Systems Engineering (407 citations). Thomas Feuring has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, United States and Japan. Frequent co-authors include James J. Buckley, Yoichi Hayashi and Esfandiar Eslami. Their work appears in journals such as Fuzzy Sets and Systems, International Journal of Uncertainty Fuzziness and Knowledge-Based Systems, Soft Computing, European Journal of Operational Research and International Journal of Intelligent Systems.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact