Thomas F. Gordon

3.4k total citations
97 papers, 1.7k citations indexed

About

Thomas F. Gordon is a scholar working on Artificial Intelligence, Political Science and International Relations and Sociology and Political Science. According to data from OpenAlex, Thomas F. Gordon has authored 97 papers receiving a total of 1.7k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 43 papers in Artificial Intelligence, 25 papers in Political Science and International Relations and 9 papers in Sociology and Political Science. Recurrent topics in Thomas F. Gordon's work include Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation (37 papers), Artificial Intelligence in Law (22 papers) and Semantic Web and Ontologies (21 papers). Thomas F. Gordon is often cited by papers focused on Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation (37 papers), Artificial Intelligence in Law (22 papers) and Semantic Web and Ontologies (21 papers). Thomas F. Gordon collaborates with scholars based in Germany, United States and Canada. Thomas F. Gordon's co-authors include Douglas Walton, Henry Prakken, Sarah Bauerle Bass, Douglas Walton, Sheryl Burt Ruzek, Stuart H. Surlin, Linda Fleisher, Dirk F. Moore, Stephanie Ward and Dominique G. Ruggieri and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, European Journal of Operational Research and Frontiers in Psychology.

In The Last Decade

Thomas F. Gordon

85 papers receiving 1.5k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Thomas F. Gordon Germany 20 851 407 226 200 134 97 1.7k
Vasileios Lampos United Kingdom 21 649 0.8× 348 0.9× 200 0.9× 605 3.0× 42 0.3× 37 2.4k
Sarah Kreps United States 27 220 0.3× 755 1.9× 92 0.4× 1.2k 6.1× 25 0.2× 86 2.7k
Maria Cucciniello Italy 22 55 0.1× 368 0.9× 286 1.3× 337 1.7× 71 0.5× 48 1.3k
John Wilkerson United States 19 193 0.2× 774 1.9× 99 0.4× 439 2.2× 13 0.1× 49 1.7k
Daniel L. Chen France 14 139 0.2× 101 0.2× 115 0.5× 676 3.4× 35 0.3× 93 2.1k
Manh‐Toan Ho Vietnam 20 197 0.2× 65 0.2× 84 0.4× 343 1.7× 24 0.2× 87 1.8k
Alan Sears Canada 21 87 0.1× 151 0.4× 223 1.0× 546 2.7× 14 0.1× 81 1.3k
Gabriel R. Sánchez United States 25 85 0.1× 805 2.0× 284 1.3× 1.2k 5.9× 10 0.1× 93 2.1k
Dejan Ravšelj Slovenia 11 64 0.1× 83 0.2× 174 0.8× 192 1.0× 27 0.2× 37 1.7k
Paulo Henrique de Souza Bermejo Brazil 15 110 0.1× 123 0.3× 27 0.1× 146 0.7× 16 0.1× 58 1.1k

Countries citing papers authored by Thomas F. Gordon

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas F. Gordon's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas F. Gordon with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas F. Gordon more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas F. Gordon

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas F. Gordon. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas F. Gordon. The network helps show where Thomas F. Gordon may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Thomas F. Gordon

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Thomas F. Gordon. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Thomas F. Gordon based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Thomas F. Gordon. Thomas F. Gordon is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Gordon, Thomas F.. (2025). Legal Knowledge and Information Systems. Archivio istituzionale della ricerca (Alma Mater Studiorum Università di Bologna). 1 indexed citations
2.
Ulrich, Connie M., Sarah J. Ratcliffe, Camille J. Hochheimer, et al.. (2023). Informed Consent among Clinical Trial Participants with Different Cancer Diagnoses. AJOB Empirical Bioethics. 15(3). 165–177. 3 indexed citations
4.
Gordon, Thomas F.. (2018). Defining Argument Weighing Functions.. Publikationsdatenbank der Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft (Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft). 5. 747–773. 5 indexed citations
5.
Ruggieri, Dominique G., et al.. (2018). Understanding Parents’ Perceptions of School-Based BMI Screening and BMI Report Cards Using Perceptual Mapping: Implications for School Nurses. The Journal of School Nursing. 36(2). 144–156. 4 indexed citations
6.
Bass, Sarah Bauerle, et al.. (2016). How Do Low-Literacy Populations Perceive “Dirty Bombs”? Implications for Preparedness Messages. Health Security. 14(5). 331–344. 11 indexed citations
8.
Walton, Douglas, Christopher W. Tindale, & Thomas F. Gordon. (2014). Applying Recent Argumentation Methods to Some Ancient Examples of Plausible Reasoning. SSRN Electronic Journal.
9.
Bass, Sarah Bauerle, Thomas F. Gordon, Sheryl Burt Ruzek, et al.. (2012). Developing a Computer Touch-Screen Interactive Colorectal Screening Decision Aid for a Low-Literacy African American Population. Health Promotion Practice. 14(4). 589–598. 20 indexed citations
10.
Gordon, Thomas F., et al.. (2010). Goal Selection in Argumentation ProcessesA Formal Model of Abduction in Argument Evaluation Structures. 51–62. 2 indexed citations
11.
Ward, Stephanie, Lalitha Parameswaran, Sarah Bauerle Bass, et al.. (2010). Resident Physicians' Perceptions of Barriers and Facilitators to Colorectal Cancer Screening for African Americans. Journal of the National Medical Association. 102(4). 303–311. 15 indexed citations
12.
Bass, Sarah Bauerle, Thomas F. Gordon, Sheryl Burt Ruzek, et al.. (2010). Perceptions of Colorectal Cancer Screening in Urban African American Clinic Patients: Differences by Gender and Screening Status. Journal of Cancer Education. 26(1). 121–128. 62 indexed citations
13.
Gordon, Thomas F. & Douglas Walton. (2006). Pierson vs. Post RevisitedA Reconstruction using the Carneades Argumentation Framework. 208–219. 14 indexed citations
14.
Gordon, Thomas F. & Douglas Walton. (2006). The Carneades Argumentation FrameworkUsing Presumptions and Exceptions to Model Critical Questions. Publikationsdatenbank der Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft (Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft). 195–207. 40 indexed citations
15.
Gordon, Thomas F.. (2004). Die Bedeutung von eGovernance für die Öffentliche Verwaltung. Verwaltung & Management. 10(5). 258–263. 1 indexed citations
16.
Gordon, Thomas F., et al.. (2001). Zeno: Groupware for Discourses on the Internet.. Publikationsdatenbank der Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft (Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft). 15. 43–45. 6 indexed citations
17.
Bing, Jon, Andrew Jones, & Thomas F. Gordon. (1999). Proceedings of the 7th international conference on Artificial intelligence and law. 5 indexed citations
18.
Gordon, Thomas F.. (1995). The Pleadings Game: An Artificial Intelligence Model of Procedural Justice. Publikationsdatenbank der Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft (Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft). 124 indexed citations
19.
Gordon, Thomas F.. (1985). On the suitability of Modula-2 for artificial intelligence programming. 27(7). 296–303. 1 indexed citations
20.
Gordon, Thomas F., et al.. (1978). Mass communication effects and processes : a comprehensive bibliography, 1950-1975. SAGE Publications eBooks. 2 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026