Thomas Ericsson

12 papers receiving 404 citations

Peers

Thomas Ericsson
Comparison fields: 5 of 66
  • Numerical Analysis 93
  • Computational Theory and Mathematics 205
  • Computational Mathematics 5
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 233
  • Statistical and Nonlinear Physics 70
Replace G. von Winckel with:
G. von Winckel United States
Dexuan Xie United States
Frédéric Legoll France
Frank Filbir Germany
J. Toivanen Finland
Frank G. Lether United States
M. S. Hussein Iraq
Erwin Brüning South Africa
Hellmut Baumgärtel Germany
Marco Marletta United Kingdom
Thomas Ericsson relative to G. von Winckel United States G. von Winckel's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.4×
G. von Winckel · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Thomas Ericsson

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas Ericsson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas Ericsson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas Ericsson more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas Ericsson

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas Ericsson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas Ericsson. The network helps show where Thomas Ericsson may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 24 scholars most cited alongside Thomas Ericsson, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Thomas Ericsson Line = papers co-authored together Thomas Ericsson links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

13 of 13 papers shown
#Work
1 1980226
2 198099
3 198745
4 200645
5 19879
6 19777
7 19876
8 19785
9 19774
10 19753
11 20202
12 20161
13 19770

About Thomas Ericsson

Thomas Ericsson is a scholar working on Computational Theory and Mathematics, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Statistical and Nonlinear Physics, Biomedical Engineering and Materials Chemistry, having authored 13 papers that have together received 452 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Matrix Theory and Algorithms (6 papers), Electromagnetic Scattering and Analysis (3 papers), Scientific Research and Discoveries (3 papers), Boron Compounds in Chemistry (1 paper), Advanced NMR Techniques and Applications (1 paper), Metal Extraction and Bioleaching (1 paper), Lipid Membrane Structure and Behavior (1 paper) and Analytical Chemistry and Chromatography (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Numerical Analysis (93 citations), Computational Theory and Mathematics (205 citations), Computational Mathematics (5 citations), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (233 citations) and Statistical and Nonlinear Physics (70 citations). Thomas Ericsson has collaborated with scholars based in Sweden, United States and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Axel Ruhe, Beresford Ν. Parlett, B. Nour‐Omid, Peter Bernhardt, Eva Forssell‐Aronsson, Helena Uusijärvi, Olof Samuelson, Göran Petersson, Hans Gustavsson and Björn Lindman. Their work appears in journals such as Mathematics of Computation, Acta chemica Scandinavica/Acta chemica Scandinavica. B, Organic chemistry and biochemistry/Acta chemica Scandinavica. A, Physical and inorganic chemistry/Acta chemica Scandinavica. Series B. Organic chemistry and biochemistry/Acta chemica Scandinavica. Series A, Physical and inorganic chemistry, Medical Physics, Communications in Computational Physics and Wood Science and Technology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact