Thomas E. Strax

26 papers receiving 771 citations

Peers

Thomas E. Strax
Comparison fields: 5 of 86
  • Pharmacology 475
  • Occupational Therapy 80
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine 162
  • Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation 57
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 220
Replace G Mellin with:
G Mellin Finland
Raymond Swinkels Netherlands
Elisabeth Skargren Sweden
C. Hérisson France
Nicole Mufraggi Spain
Neil K. Roach United Kingdom
Mario Gestoso Spain
Ismail Ebrahimi Takamjani Iran
Craig Liebenson United States
Robert E. Boyles United States
Thomas E. Strax relative to G Mellin Finland G Mellin's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.8×
G Mellin · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Thomas E. Strax

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas E. Strax's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas E. Strax with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas E. Strax more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas E. Strax

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas E. Strax. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas E. Strax. The network helps show where Thomas E. Strax may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 17 scholars most cited alongside Thomas E. Strax, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Thomas E. Strax Line = papers co-authored together Thomas E. Strax links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 27 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1996257
2 1995143
3 199586
4 199146
5 200540
6 199536
7 201034
8 200428
9 199524
10 199518
11 196918
12 200415
13 200514
14 200612
15 201111
16 19949
17 19918
18 19887
19 19966
20 20085

About Thomas E. Strax

Thomas E. Strax is a scholar working on Pharmacology, Surgery, Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Psychiatry and Mental health and Rehabilitation, having authored 27 papers that have together received 836 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (8 papers), Cerebral Palsy and Movement Disorders (4 papers), Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology (3 papers), Musculoskeletal Disorders and Rehabilitation (3 papers), Spinal Cord Injury Research (3 papers), Dysphagia Assessment and Management (2 papers), Shoulder Injury and Treatment (2 papers) and Innovations in Medical Education (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Pharmacology (475 citations), Occupational Therapy (80 citations), Orthopedics and Sports Medicine (162 citations), Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation (57 citations) and Pathology and Forensic Medicine (220 citations). Thomas E. Strax has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Japan. Frequent co-authors include Osamu Shirado, Toshikazu Ito, Kiyoshi Kaneda, Hideki Suzuki, Masaaki Takahashi, Akio Minami, Sara J. Cuccurullo, Naoki Takeda, Heather Platt and Kiyoshi Kaneda. Their work appears in journals such as American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Clinics of North America, Spine and Pediatric Annals.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact