Thomas E. Rinderer

6.2k citations
209 papers · 4.9k indexed · h-index 38

Impact in

Papers in

Thomas E. Rinderer

207 papers receiving 4.6k citations

Peers

Thomas E. Rinderer
Comparison fields: 5 of 81
  • Insect Science 4.6k
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 4.4k
  • Genetics 4.3k
  • Plant Science 192
  • Geometry and Topology 32
Replace Gloria DeGrandi‐Hoffman with:
Gloria DeGrandi‐Hoffman United States
Lionel Garnery France
Ernesto Guzmán‐Novoa Canada
Per Kryger Denmark
Gard W. Otis Canada
Anita M. Collins United States
Geoffrey R. Williams United States
Maria Cristina Arias Brazil
M. Alice Pinto Portugal
Amro Zayed Canada
Thomas E. Rinderer relative to Gloria DeGrandi‐Hoffman United States Gloria DeGrandi‐Hoffman's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Gloria DeGrandi‐Hoffman · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Thomas E. Rinderer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas E. Rinderer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas E. Rinderer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas E. Rinderer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas E. Rinderer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas E. Rinderer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas E. Rinderer. The network helps show where Thomas E. Rinderer may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Thomas E. Rinderer, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Thomas E. Rinderer Line = papers co-authored together Thomas E. Rinderer links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 209 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2010151
2 1991127
3 1982113
4 2005103
5 200197
6 200296
7 199291
8 200989
9 201588
10 199783
11 200881
12 199181
13 199375
14 199669
15 198563
16 198461
17 200157
18 199754
19 199352
20 200552

About Thomas E. Rinderer

Thomas E. Rinderer is a scholar working on Insect Science, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Genetics, Plant Science and Ecology, having authored 209 papers that have together received 4.9k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Insect and Pesticide Research (203 papers), Plant and animal studies (190 papers), Insect and Arachnid Ecology and Behavior (185 papers), Insect-Plant Interactions and Control (10 papers), Bee Products Chemical Analysis (9 papers), Plant Virus Research Studies (3 papers), Study of Mite Species (2 papers) and Plant Parasitism and Resistance (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Insect Science (4.6k citations), Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (4.4k citations), Genetics (4.3k citations), Plant Science (192 citations) and Geometry and Topology (32 citations). Thomas E. Rinderer has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Thailand and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Benjamin P. Oldroyd, Lilia I. de Guzman, Anita M. Collins, Robert G. Danka, Steven M. Buco, H. Allen Sylvester, J. A. Stelzer, Siriwat Wongsiri, John R. Harbo and Amanda M. Frake. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Apicultural Research, Apidologie, Journal of Economic Entomology, Annals of the Entomological Society of America and Journal of Invertebrate Pathology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact