Thomas E. Love

7.4k citations
121 papers · 5.3k indexed · h-index 40

Thomas E. Love

121 papers receiving 5.2k citations

Peers

Thomas E. Love
Comparison fields: 5 of 153
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 2.8k
  • Nephrology 530
  • Family Practice 100
  • Health Information Management 162
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 1.1k
Replace Anoop D Shah with:
Anoop D Shah United Kingdom
Sean Coady United States
Jennifer G. Robinson United States
Karen S. Pieper United States
Glen C. Bennett United States
David Naimark Canada
Merril L. Knudtson Canada
Robert N. Doughty New Zealand
Mark R. Cobain United Kingdom
Wendy Gattis Stough United States
Thomas E. Love relative to Anoop D Shah United Kingdom Anoop D Shah's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.6×
Anoop D Shah · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Thomas E. Love

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas E. Love's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas E. Love with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas E. Love more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas E. Love

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas E. Love. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas E. Love. The network helps show where Thomas E. Love may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Thomas E. Love, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Thomas E. Love Line = papers co-authored together Thomas E. Love links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20244
2 20212
3 202110
4 202048
5 201913
6 201724
7 20176
8
Use and perceived value of health information exchange: one public healthcare system's experience.
201316
9 201330
10 20131
11 201135
12 201157
13 201112
14 20118
15 201074
16 200917
17 20089
18 200761
19 2006420
20 200583

About Thomas E. Love

Thomas E. Love is a scholar working on Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Family Practice and Geriatrics and Gerontology, having authored 121 papers that have together received 5.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Heart Failure Treatment and Management (53 papers), Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors (35 papers), Potassium and Related Disorders (17 papers), Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies (12 papers), Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (7 papers), Healthcare Policy and Management (7 papers), Diabetes Treatment and Management (6 papers) and Dialysis and Renal Disease Management (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (2.8k citations), Nephrology (530 citations) and Family Practice (100 citations). Thomas E. Love has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and Greece. Frequent co-authors include Ali Ahmed, Inmaculada Aban, Michael W. Rich, Richard M. Allman, Wilbert S. Aronow, Gregg C. Fonarow, Mihai Gheorghiade, Kirkwood F. Adams, Randall D. Cebul and Dalane W. Kitzman. Their work appears in journals such as International Journal of Cardiology, The American Journal of Cardiology, The American Journal of Medicine, Journal of Cardiac Failure and European Journal of Heart Failure.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026