Thomas E. Angel

2.4k citations
36 papers · 1.8k · h-index 21

Impact in

Papers in

Thomas E. Angel

36 papers receiving 1.8k citations

Peers

Thomas E. Angel
Comparison fields: 5 of 118
  • Spectroscopy 367
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 320
  • Molecular Biology 1.1k
  • Virology 56
  • Biological Psychiatry 21
Replace Steven H. Seeholzer with:
Steven H. Seeholzer United States
Andreas Braun Germany
Arnaud Leroy France
Louis Scampavia United States
Simon H. J. Brown Australia
Tohru Ichimura Japan
Ruedi H. Aebersold United States
Cheryl F. Lichti United States
Insil Kim United States
Clay Bracken United States
Thomas E. Angel relative to Steven H. Seeholzer United States Steven H. Seeholzer's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Steven H. Seeholzer · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Thomas E. Angel

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas E. Angel's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas E. Angel with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas E. Angel more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas E. Angel

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas E. Angel. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas E. Angel. The network helps show where Thomas E. Angel may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Thomas E. Angel, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Thomas E. Angel Line = papers co-authored together Thomas E. Angel links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 36 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2012310
2 2009206
3 2009174
4 2010163
5 2012135
6 201680
7 201178
8 201566
9 201553
10 201253
11 201545
12 201240
13 200337
14 200936
15 201335
16 201334
17 201029
18 201424
19 200822
20 201222

About Thomas E. Angel

Thomas E. Angel is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Spectroscopy, Epidemiology and Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, having authored 36 papers that have together received 1.8k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Receptor Mechanisms and Signaling (6 papers), Advanced Proteomics Techniques and Applications (6 papers), Metabolomics and Mass Spectrometry Studies (5 papers), Mass Spectrometry Techniques and Applications (5 papers), Monoclonal and Polyclonal Antibodies Research (4 papers), Photoreceptor and optogenetics research (4 papers), Liver Disease Diagnosis and Treatment (3 papers) and Neuropeptides and Animal Physiology (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Spectroscopy (367 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (320 citations), Molecular Biology (1.1k citations), Virology (56 citations) and Biological Psychiatry (21 citations). Thomas E. Angel has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Sweden and Austria. Frequent co-authors include Krzysztof Palczewski, Mark R. Chance, Richard Smith, Uma K. Aryal, Shawna Hengel, Ryan Kelly, Erin Baker, Errol Robinson, Edward A. Dratz and Beata Jastrzębska. Their work appears in journals such as PLoS ONE, Journal of Proteome Research, Analytical Chemistry, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences and Journal of Biological Chemistry.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact