Thomas Drew

23 papers receiving 302 citations

Peers

Thomas Drew
Comparison fields: 5 of 68
  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine 55
  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine 22
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology 31
  • Emergency Medicine 38
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 69
Replace Hyungseok Seo with:
Hyungseok Seo South Korea
Arash Mehdiani Germany
Dawna J. Kramer United States
Kang-long Yu China
Edward Haeusler Italy
Jennifer A. Besse United States
Shirley Potter Ireland
Abraham Sonny United States
Grant D. Taylor United States
Thomas Drew relative to Hyungseok Seo South Korea Hyungseok Seo's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.1×
Hyungseok Seo · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Thomas Drew

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas Drew's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas Drew with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas Drew more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas Drew

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas Drew. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas Drew. The network helps show where Thomas Drew may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Thomas Drew, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Thomas Drew Line = papers co-authored together Thomas Drew links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 27 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200967
2 197628
3 198627
4 199023
5 201819
6 201919
7 201018
8 201816
9 202115
10 199110
11 202010
12 20119
13 20229
14 19928
15 19908
16 20197
17 19866
18 20195
19
SOX11 but not SOX4 is a prognostic marker for improved recurrence free survival in epithelial ovarian cancer
20093
20 20182

About Thomas Drew

Thomas Drew is a scholar working on Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Obstetrics and Gynecology, Reproductive Medicine, Surgery and Emergency Medicine, having authored 27 papers that have together received 314 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Airway Management and Intubation Techniques (6 papers), Tracheal and airway disorders (6 papers), Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions (5 papers), Maternal and fetal healthcare (5 papers), Trauma Management and Diagnosis (5 papers), Coronary Interventions and Diagnostics (3 papers), Pregnancy-related medical research (2 papers) and Ovarian cancer diagnosis and treatment (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (55 citations), Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine (22 citations), Obstetrics and Gynecology (31 citations), Emergency Medicine (38 citations) and Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (69 citations). Thomas Drew has collaborated with scholars based in Ireland, United States and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Conán McCaul, David O. Williams, Keith L. Black, Mrinalini Balki, Ronald Altman, Martin Goldfield, Arun Kumar Singh, Walter Donat, William C. Feng and John McB. Hodgson. Their work appears in journals such as British Journal of Anaesthesia, Journal of the American College of Cardiology, International Journal of Obstetric Anesthesia, Emergency Medicine Journal and The Annals of Thoracic Surgery.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact