Thomas Clarke
- Complementary and alternative medicine top 2%
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
- Surgery
- Orthopedics and Sports Medicine top 5%
- Cognitive Neuroscience
- Co-authors
- Luke HughesStephen D. PattersonFares S. HaddadDaniel S. McCarthyBruce PatonJo DawesConor GissaneIan Duguid
- Topics
- Neural dynamics and brain function (3 papers)Zebrafish Biomedical Research Applications (2 papers)Sports injuries and prevention (2 papers)
- Cited by
- Complementary and alternative medicineOrthopedics and Sports MedicineCardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
- Journals
- NeuronSports MedicineCell Reports
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited StatesCanada
In The Last Decade
Thomas Clarke
6 papers receiving 297 citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 55
- Complementary and alternative medicine 159
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 113
- Surgery 111
- Orthopedics and Sports Medicine 104
- Cognitive Neuroscience 58
Countries citing papers authored by Thomas Clarke
This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas Clarke's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas Clarke with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas Clarke more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas Clarke
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas Clarke. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas Clarke. The network helps show where Thomas Clarke may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Thomas Clarke
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Thomas Clarke. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Thomas Clarke based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Thomas Clarke. Thomas Clarke is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 10 | |
| 3 | 70 | |
| 4 | Comparing the Effectiveness of Blood Flow Restriction and Traditional Heavy Load Resistance Training in the Post-Surgery Rehabilitation of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Patients: A UK National Health Service Randomised Controlled Trialbreakdown → | 176 |
| 5 | 56 | |
| 6 | 2 |
About Thomas Clarke
Thomas Clarke is a scholar working on Complementary and alternative medicine, Neurology and Orthopedics and Sports Medicine, having authored 6 papers that have together received 315 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neural dynamics and brain function (3 papers), Zebrafish Biomedical Research Applications (2 papers) and Sports injuries and prevention (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Complementary and alternative medicine (159 citations), Orthopedics and Sports Medicine (104 citations) and Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (113 citations). Thomas Clarke has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Luke Hughes, Stephen D. Patterson, Fares S. Haddad, Daniel S. McCarthy, Bruce Paton, Jo Dawes, Conor Gissane, Ian Duguid, Julia Schiemann and Janelle M.P. Pakan. Their work appears in journals such as Neuron, Sports Medicine and Cell Reports.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.